Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 17

Thread: FAST getting tough on software piracy

  1. #1
    Taz
    Taz is offline
    Senior Member Taz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,152
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked
    29 times in 27 posts
    • Taz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z270 HD3P
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 7600K
      • Memory:
      • Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16R Vengeance LPX 16 GB
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 960 EVO M.2-2280 500GB (PCIe) + 1TB Sandisk Ultra II SSD (SATA)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CS550M 550W Hybrid
      • Case:
      • NZXT Source 340
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 34" Asus Designo Curve MX34VQ UWQHD Monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media M350

    FAST getting tough on software piracy

    Several Internet service providers have been forced to reveal the personal details of alleged software pirates:

    Full story here:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4663388.stm

  2. #2
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    An undercover investigator working for Fast in a project codenamed Operation Tracker identified 150 people suspected of illegally sharing software.
    Y'know, when it was people chasing people with guns and having bulletproof armor it was cool to name things "Operation <insert random word here>", but think about it.

    "Commence Operation Tracker"
    "What're you going to do?"
    "Phone him and tell him he's been a naughty boy" or "Arrest him with prior warning"

    It just doesn't seem all gravy anymore.

  3. #3
    radix lecti dave87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,806
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked
    931 times in 634 posts
    • dave87's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus
      • CPU:
      • i5 3470k under Corsair H80 WC
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 240gb SSD + 120gb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD7950
      • PSU:
      • XFX 600w Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A05FNB + Acoustipack
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell S2309W (1920x1080)
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Option 2
    Thats great but wasn't the data protection act meant to limit the access to personally identifiable information? This sets a precendent that the government can and will force companies to pass on information - im guessing relating to the Personal details - linked with the IPs they have. I'm not supporting piracy, don't get me wrong, but I just have doubts about the lengths to which they will go to defend copyright.

    Dave

  4. #4
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    I think it's justifiable

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I hope i haven't

  6. #6
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media
    It is justifiable, but how do they know whos pirating software? and who is legitmately sharing linux isos and such, they cant hit everyone thats running ed2k/gnutella, and once they start packet sniffing id imagine theyd be on dubious grounds with regards to the wiretapping regs. And who the hell downloads software from anything other than bittorrent anyway?

  7. #7
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    Because most people constantly use the excuse "Oh I'm sharing Linux ISOs" when all they're doing is covering up their illegal file sharing. I doubt people would download ISOs 24/7, upload them for sharing maybe, but not downloading them all the time. It's an over-used excuse and I see it used all the time as an excuse for people to ask for help with bit torrent.

  8. #8
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media
    Quote Originally Posted by Kezzer
    Because most people constantly use the excuse "Oh I'm sharing Linux ISOs" when all they're doing is covering up their illegal file sharing. I doubt people would download ISOs 24/7, upload them for sharing maybe, but not downloading them all the time. It's an over-used excuse and I see it used all the time as an excuse for people to ask for help with bit torrent.
    Im not saying piracy is ok, you distinctly can justify someone arresting for it. My point was with the way they went about it. snooping traffic is of dubious legality as far as im aware. Connecting IPs to real names? WEll, id like to know what ISPs do it, but if they have a court order theres not a lot they can do anyway.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    I think it's wrong yes, monitoring that kind of traffic is quite immense I must say. We'll see who gets sued soon enough I guess.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    150 seems a small number though doesn't it,hardly anything

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Manchester,UK
    Posts
    366
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Maybe they should call a visit to Bowlers

    dro pby with Bobbies ..... last time i went saw loads of copied Appz.....

    Shame really - that they cant stop it- im sure some peeps will have Annonamous IP's and its even worse for AOL consumers reason why is that each time you start the net- your IP changes-because AOL have bought a certain Range of IPS to use- and it's liek about 1 billion+ different combinations.....

    i only know this cos some chump started to hack me x clans Teamspeak server -tracked the IP- turned out to be someoen in Glasgow,Then 5 mins later turned otu to be Liverpool,then Swindon...

  12. #12
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    I think a lot of users are unaware that file sharing is illegal still. I know plenty of them who have no idea it's illegal (even though it's obvious, but the digital world is a different reality)

  13. #13
    ?!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,045
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by vincent
    Maybe they should call a visit to Bowlers

    dro pby with Bobbies ..... last time i went saw loads of copied Appz.....

    Shame really - that they cant stop it- im sure some peeps will have Annonamous IP's and its even worse for AOL consumers reason why is that each time you start the net- your IP changes-because AOL have bought a certain Range of IPS to use- and it's liek about 1 billion+ different combinations.....

    i only know this cos some chump started to hack me x clans Teamspeak server -tracked the IP- turned out to be someoen in Glasgow,Then 5 mins later turned otu to be Liverpool,then Swindon...
    By design they audit trail logins to customer accounts.

  14. #14
    ?!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,045
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kezzer
    I think a lot of users are unaware that file sharing is illegal still. I know plenty of them who have no idea it's illegal (even though it's obvious, but the digital world is a different reality)
    Many are perfectly aware, they (users) just dont care.

    And will the linux iso excuse finally die in a fire?

  15. #15
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts
    so let me get this straight, 12 months, 150 people.

    I after taking into account public holidays, and weekends etc, and assuming standard EU working week directive's prefered working hours:

    It says team, assume a team of 3. that means you have to catch one person every 31.168831168831168831168831168831 working hours (approx)

    I could deal with that workload
    (just get one person, then not bother turning up for a couple of days)

    But seriously, surely they just looked on like iMesh, for everyone in the UK RIPE designated IP block, who had certain known illegal files, look at what files they have, ranked them in seriousness. But only 150? Jinkies, i'd catch loads more!
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

  16. #16
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by javalord
    And will the linux iso excuse finally die in a fire?
    We can only hope.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Cut software piracy, boost UK economy?
    By Trippledence in forum Question Time
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 20-12-2005, 04:29 PM
  2. Linux - Install Java
    By nvening in forum Software
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 20-12-2005, 03:14 PM
  3. Software devs still not doing their jobs right!
    By aidanjt in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 08-08-2005, 06:54 PM
  4. What are people’s views on Software piracy?
    By Jimmy Little in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 23-09-2003, 10:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •