Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Freedom is a confusing thing isn't it?

  1. #1
    LUSE Galant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Gibraltar
    Posts
    3,261
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    559 times in 341 posts

    Freedom is a confusing thing isn't it?

    In a puzzling move, it seems that France, that bastion of 'true freedom' and democracy, is contemplating a law which would ban the wearing of "'conspicuous' religious signs" in schools.

    Apparently, the best way to promote religious freedom and equality is to ban the wearing of headscarves by muslims, skull-caps by Jews, and large crosses by Christians. It has been said the "discreet" medallions and pendants would be allowed, but no-one has mentioned what is considered discreet or large, or who decides that.

    Within the report they also included that the Muslim Eid and Jewish Yom-Kippur holidays be celebrated in schools.

    The full BBC article can be found here, it's not too long.

    So what do you think....a magnificent move towards greater freedom?

    CK.


    P.S. In a related article, the issue of headscarves is further developed. That article can be found hereand maybe it's just me, but does anyone else find it amusing to read:

    "France is currently considering an outright ban on the wearing of veils in schools, while in Germany, two states have proposed legislation which would also bar the scarf from educational institutions.
    In both countries it is argued that the covering of the head is a symbol of women's oppression which has no place in a democratic society - and certainly not in a school", and then find out that 'bigot' is a French word?


  2. #2
    Senile Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    442
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Many things are not allowed in schools.

    I personally think that the less religion is allowed to affect children (christianity, islam, whatever) the better.

  3. #3
    Pink & Fluffy! Elmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Glarsgow
    Posts
    3,234
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    but it's their religious duty to cover themselves from head to foot, it's part of their religion, as is the wearing of scull caps by jews. You cant rewrite someone's religion or punish them for following their religious rules as it were!

  4. #4
    Senile Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    442
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    What about rastafarians, is it ok if they smoke weed in school?

    I understand what you are saying but where do you draw the line?

    You could also argue that a tolerant religion would not place such restrictions on a person so in a way the person is punishing themselves by choosing to follow odd rules.

    nice xmas sig btw

  5. #5
    Pink & Fluffy! Elmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Glarsgow
    Posts
    3,234
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    they havent chosen to follow "odd rules", they were born into a strict religion and brought up in such a religion, in a way it's all they know. Religion in other parts of the world are a lot more strict, demanding and whatever else than they are in the most part of europe. By stripping people of their religious dress is like stripping them of their religion, forcing them to sin and then having other followers of the same religion frown upon them. It's hardly fair. Why cant we all just live and let be? If everyone was the same the world would be a very boring, bland and BIEGE place.

    <edit> thanks about the sig

  6. #6
    LUSE Galant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Gibraltar
    Posts
    3,261
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    559 times in 341 posts
    Erm, smoking weed is illegal, wearing a piece of cloth isn't!
    No trees were harmed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were displaced and terribly inconvenienced.

  7. #7
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    738
    Thanked
    1,609 times in 1,048 posts
    Originally posted by Galant
    Erm, smoking weed is illegal, wearing a piece of cloth isn't!
    yet.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  8. #8
    cat /dev/null streetster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    100 times in 82 posts
    • streetster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7P55D-E
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 750 2.67 @ 4.0Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 2x1TB Drives [RAID0]
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2xSapphire HD 4870 512MB CrossFireX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Black Widow
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2311
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50Mb
    depends if you are just wearing a piece of cloth does seem a bit stupid making parts of peoples religion a punishable offence ? ah well silly froggies

    mark

  9. #9
    LUSE Galant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Gibraltar
    Posts
    3,261
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    559 times in 341 posts
    Ban your way to freedom - No-one find that a bit ironic?

    And then all that other stuff: "In both countries it is argued that the covering of the head is a symbol of women's oppression which has no place in a democratic society - and certainly not in a school."

    Erm, wasn't it the French who were screaming 'Bigot! Bigot!' at Bush and others recently?

    French word indeed!
    No trees were harmed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were displaced and terribly inconvenienced.

  10. #10
    Blue Army Member spazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sonning, Reading, Berks
    Posts
    1,939
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts
    • spazman's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte DS3
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2GB Corsair PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 320gb RAID 0 , 250gb IDE , 160gb IDE, 400bg USB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 7900GX2
      • PSU:
      • 750watt Enermax
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" LCD 19" CRT
      • Internet:
      • Be Unlimited
    hypocrytical bast ids
    NES, SNES, N64, GameCube, Wii, GBA, DS, PSone, PS2, PSP, PS3 60gb, XBOX, XBOX 360, Master System, Game Gear, Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, PC Engine, Neo Geo CD

  11. #11
    Senile Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    442
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I just remembered about sikhs, this will affect them too since they wear turbans.

    Having said that sikhs are supposed to carry knives too but I bet thats already been banned!

    On thinking about it I dont agree with them trying to ban these things.

    I still have my worries about requiring women, but not men, to cover their heads.

  12. #12
    Goat Boy
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Alexandra Park, London
    Posts
    2,428
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    People should be allowed to wear what they want, as long as it isn't offensuve to others. I cant see how a scarf is offensive.

    What on earth is there to be offended by? Who is it hurting? French culture?
    "All our beliefs are being challenged now, and rightfully so, they're stupid." - Bill Hicks

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •