Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: 1680*1050

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • Kurshu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 2600k @ 4.6ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F3 x2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD 5870 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX V2 750W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF X
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional (64x)
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" LG Flatron M2262D
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media (50mbs)

    1680*1050

    I will be gaming at the stated resolution. Which of these cards would I see the best performance from in games like WoW, CSS, CS 1.6 and possibly some of the newer games as they come out.

    • HD 4850
    • HD 4870
    • GTX 260
    • 9800 GTX+


    Thanks in advance.

    This will be paired with an E5200(3.2ghz) and 4 gigs of 800 mhz ram.

  2. #2
    I'm ITX
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,415
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    159 times in 148 posts

    Re: 1680*1050

    4850 is cheapest and performs good enough for the resolution, i'd go for that

    It's 4.98*

  3. #3
    Efficiently lazy shadowmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,233
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked
    310 times in 208 posts
    • shadowmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.6Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS3
      • Storage:
      • Kingston SSD V series 64GB + Samsung F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 5870 1GB in Crossfire
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 1200W Dark Power Pro
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker 832 SE
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3 x BenQ G2222HDL 21.5inch 1080p
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2

    Re: 1680*1050

    In those games with that resolution the ati 4850 or the 9800gtx+ should do you fine. In terms of overall performance I think the ati 4850 is a touch better then the 9800gtx+ but don't quote me on that. I'd go with the one you find cheaper.

    If you want a bit more future proofing and plan to play some more demanding games then it might not be a bad idea to go for an ati 4870 or gtx 260. In terms of performance once again its a bit like the above, both are very similar but I would say the 4870 is bit touch faster (5% more according to some review sites), but tbh you cant go wrong with either

  4. #4
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The land of Brum
    Posts
    10,143
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked
    1,226 times in 1,123 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX8350 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 512gb samsung SSD +1tb Samsung HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EGVA GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic GX 650W
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • W7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama XB3270QS-B1 32" IPS 1440p

    Re: 1680*1050

    Well for WoW, CSS, CS 1.6 they are all overkill

    A 9800gt 512mb or 4830 512mb would be fine and under £100
    However I would consider the 9800gtx+ or 4850 512mb as well, for more demanding games.
    Personally speaking a 4870 or gtx260 are overkill for 1680x1050 I've not found anything that really struggles on my 9800gtx (original not +) at 1680x1050

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • Kurshu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 2600k @ 4.6ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F3 x2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD 5870 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX V2 750W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF X
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional (64x)
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" LG Flatron M2262D
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media (50mbs)

    Re: 1680*1050

    Would a 4850 or 9800 be able to play GTA IV at... lets say... the lowest settings?

  6. #6
    DDY
    DDY is offline
    Senior Member DDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,844
    Thanks
    185
    Thanked
    631 times in 436 posts
    • DDY's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z390M Pro 4
      • CPU:
      • i5 9600k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (2x16GB) 3600MHz
      • Storage:
      • Adata SX8200 NVME 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 5700
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 550W
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2715H

    Re: 1680*1050

    A HD 4850 manages around 30fps at 1680x1050 on GTA IV with moderate settings, everything set to low may push the FPS up to around 50 or more.

  7. #7
    Efficiently lazy shadowmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,233
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked
    310 times in 208 posts
    • shadowmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.6Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS3
      • Storage:
      • Kingston SSD V series 64GB + Samsung F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 5870 1GB in Crossfire
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 1200W Dark Power Pro
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker 832 SE
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3 x BenQ G2222HDL 21.5inch 1080p
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2

    Re: 1680*1050

    If you intend to play GTAIV I would probably go for the ati 4870/GTX 260.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The land of Brum
    Posts
    10,143
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked
    1,226 times in 1,123 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX8350 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 512gb samsung SSD +1tb Samsung HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EGVA GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic GX 650W
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • W7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama XB3270QS-B1 32" IPS 1440p

    Re: 1680*1050

    Well from what I've heard about the pc version, you'd be better off buying a console
    http://forums.hexus.net/hexus-gaming...v-pc-fail.html

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • Kurshu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 2600k @ 4.6ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F3 x2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD 5870 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX V2 750W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF X
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional (64x)
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" LG Flatron M2262D
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media (50mbs)

    Re: 1680*1050

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Well from what I've heard about the pc version, you'd be better off buying a console
    http://forums.hexus.net/hexus-gaming...v-pc-fail.html
    Meh, I would rather try it myself, I don't need to play games at the highest settings. I am all about the gameplay.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: 1680*1050

    Maybe you should get something in preparation that you will need 1920 x 1200 screens in time to come. It might be even faster then you think with the falling prices. I will get a HD4850.

  11. #11
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Gentlemen.. we're history Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Jita
    Posts
    8,365
    Thanks
    304
    Thanked
    568 times in 409 posts

    Re: 1680*1050

    CS:S is more about your CPU than your graphics card to be honest.
    □ΞVΞ□

  12. #12
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: 1680*1050

    GTA IV has bad frame rates even on the consoles. For the other games you listed, you should be able to get a 9800gtx+ for a good price but for extra power go for a 4850 - I have the HIS 4850 IceQ TurboX which is overclocked, but runs cooler and uses less power than the stock card!

  13. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked
    4 times in 3 posts
    • radar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DVI Infinity nF4 SLI
      • CPU:
      • AMD Athlon 64 3700+ o/c @ 2.81Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 1GB + 512MB DDR
      • Storage:
      • Maxtor 160GB @ 7200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD2900XT 512MB o/c @ 800/850Mhz
      • PSU:
      • FSP 700W
      • Case:
      • Black, Silver front edgeing. Alienware looking.
      • Operating System:
      • Microsoft Windows XP x32
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dual - 17" & 22" Widescreen
      • Internet:
      • Standard Wireless

    Re: 1680*1050

    My 7300GT 512mb does these games fine in that resolution, so all of them should do.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    350
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked
    15 times in 14 posts
    • WhiteGiant's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q-E (1901 BIOS)
      • CPU:
      • Intel E8400 @ 3.6Ghz / TRUE Black
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Corsair 4-4-4-12 @2.1v
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500gb Seagate (RAID0) + Storage drives(1.7tb)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Powercolor 4870 1gb
      • PSU:
      • Enermax 500w (Modular)
      • Case:
      • Antec Nine Hundred v1
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 Home Premium
      • Monitor(s):
      • Belinea Artistline 22w
      • Internet:
      • Sky Max - oddly getting faster.

    Re: 1680*1050

    Been playing as many 'new' games as possible with my new build, including Fallout 3, NFS:Undercover, etc. All on max @ 1680x1050 - its been brilliant, not a single slowdown.

    Tell a lie, playing SupCom, and four commanders all exploded at the same time within about 20ft of each other, inside a massive base, that caused a momentary blip
    "Don't wanna see your face, don't wanna hear your voice . . ."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •