I just hit 280....I was praying whilst I did it!
I just hit 280....I was praying whilst I did it!
No. Having a crap CPU, RAM, timings, etc... are less of an influence in your end score with 3DMark03 than 3DMark01.Originally Posted by Skii
Previous System
||3DMark01 - 18,533|3DMark03 - 6,501|Aqua Mark 3 - 43,912|[AthonXP 2500+@ 2.4Ghz - 12*200, Radeon 9800SE (unlocked) 440/369]||
Current System
||3DMark01 - 30,949|3DMark03 - 18,122|3DMark05 - 8,483|3DMark06 - 4,222|||
172.18, paid £120 about 4 months ago for my herc 9800pro
3D Mark 2k1 - 20661
If you get a customer, or an employee, who thinks he's Charles Bronson, take the butt of your gun and smash their nose in.
Video card settings: 434/348, 16x AF, high quality textures and mipmap
System settings: ran at 200FSB with 11-2-2-2.5 timings and obviously single channel
2.3Ghz - 3DMark01: 14835 3DMark03: 4886
2Ghz - 3DMark01: 14310 3DMark03: 4846
1.4Ghz - 3DMark01: 12054 3DMark03: 4723
2.3 -> 2 a 13% difference in clock speed, '01: 3.5% difference, '03: 0.8% difference
2 -> 1.4 a 30% difference in clock speed, '01: 15.8% difference, '03: 2.5% difference
2.3 -> 1.4 a 39% difference in clock speed, '01: 18.7% difference, '03: 3.3% difference
Previous System
||3DMark01 - 18,533|3DMark03 - 6,501|Aqua Mark 3 - 43,912|[AthonXP 2500+@ 2.4Ghz - 12*200, Radeon 9800SE (unlocked) 440/369]||
Current System
||3DMark01 - 30,949|3DMark03 - 18,122|3DMark05 - 8,483|3DMark06 - 4,222|||
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)