Read the article here
Thoughts anyone?
Read the article here
Thoughts anyone?
It's a constant battle for sales, trouble is joe public can get confused. Especially at a time like this, when new cards are hitting the streets. Makes you wonder if the card companies instigate some of these articles?
But I agree with your point, as long as it works...
In their defence, Windows XP 64bit is still in beta, but if you feel daring, you could try Windows XP 64bit Catalyst BETA - for the braaaaaaaaaave people... ...Originally Posted by 0iD
Thats all well and good, but if it was nVidia that had done this, the ATI "OMGLOLOLOLOL NVN00bs !!11one Nv CHEATS AGAIN !!!< OLOLLLLOMG!!!1" crew would have had a field dayOriginally Posted by Kez
Theres nothing wrong with liking one company over another, but when people are making different rules for what they consider to be acceptable in image quality, depending on their company preference, its just silly.
Its THG, i wouldnt pay too much attention tbh.
I dont like sig pics so i turn off sigs Which doesnt help when i dont know what ive written here! DOH!
I really couldnt care less, nvidia n ati can 'cheat' all they like as long as it gives me good performance. i dont see why it matters so much. jus so people can complain about sum getting 100 more 3dmarks, i mean ffs.
HEXUS|iMc
Tbh, whomever gets best bang for buck is going to get my purchase.
Also i have only just got a radeon 9800 so i dont plan on upgrading for at least a year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)