Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: well that was an anti climax

  1. #1
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    94 times in 80 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    well that was an anti climax

    So I decided to replace my gtx 460s with a single 670, figured it'd be more than enough grunt for 1200p.

    It was NFS Most Wanted that tripped up the previous residents, so installed it, maxed alll settings etc. yeah babeh...wtf 45fps and stuttering?!?!

    OK that might be for story's sake it only happens on crashes and lots of stuff on screen but i really thought a 670 would have been enough to go back to the life of max all settings and not a blip.

    I'm not *too* bothered about buying a second one but I was really looking forward to having a single card take a tinkle over everything that was thrown at it...

    Did I miss a benchmark or something ? It seemed like gfx cards now have progressed so seductively (that's the verb I choose and I'm sticking by it) so that us single screen gamers can plonk in a high end card and be able to just ramp the settings up and not have to worry about stuttering.

    I will admit I did turn on Ambient Occlusion to Quality in the control panel, and then put it to max in the game, maybe it's this..but I thought gfx cards nowadays were so beastly that chewing through a resolution only a bunny's fart away from 1080p would be counted as a morning workout, rather than a an Oxford entrance exam (you'll have to excuse my analogies, I'm drunk on bourbon and tears of disappointment).

    Colour commentary aside, while this was surprising, it wasn't heart-wrenching - i was planning on putting a second one in if need be in a couple of weeks..but I really didn't think I'd need to..these cards are supposed to be the dons for the "living room resolution" (I'm not, but soon to be moving it to a 55" LCD...you guys can keep your 1600p 30" screens, it's beautiful and all, but god damn i just LOVE big screen gaming, it's SO much more immersive! Plus with the filters etc. that new TVs offer I have to go big rather than dense).

    This was just a whinge but with it being a forum a suppose I should start a conversation (hmmf) am I doing something wrong ? Should I disable AO in control panel and let games do it?
    PS: No point bringing the 1600p argument, i've played on 3x1600p (3xgtx680s! I would have killed and robbed him but you know familys, they hold a grudge) and it just didn't wow me as much as 1 big 55/65" screen

  2. #2
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,040
    Thanks
    1,881
    Thanked
    3,380 times in 2,717 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: well that was an anti climax

    Yeah, always unwise to have a similar technology on both in game and in a card override setting - unless you know they are designed to work together to disable the least efficient one. With AO there's no guarantee that the game engine is using the same method as the nVidia inspector override, so you could be massively adding to the workload with no visual benefit.

    Also sometimes these cards/games need some driver optimisation. If the game engine is limiting (waiting on something like physics calculations or network stuff for etc.) then throwing more GPU power at it might not help.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,545
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    289 times in 180 posts
    • Jasp's system
      • CPU:
      • i5 3570k @ 3.4GHZ
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3 1600MHZ
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 512Gb Crucial MX100 1 x 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 670 SC
      • PSU:
      • 850W Corsair HX
      • Case:
      • Coolmaster Haf X V2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64-Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M 1920X1200
      • Internet:
      • 6Mb ADSL

    Re: well that was an anti climax

    If i recall correctly, NFS Most wanted the new one is a awful PC port and really doesn't play nice anyway.

  4. #4
    Moderator chuckskull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    7,713
    Thanks
    950
    Thanked
    690 times in 463 posts
    • chuckskull's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.7 - H100i
      • Memory:
      • 32GB XMS3 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 850 Pro + 3TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 980Ti Classified
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12 700W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus VG278HE
      • Internet:
      • FTTC

    Re: well that was an anti climax

    It ran like a bag of spanners for me too. Wasn't that impressed with the gameplay either. Your cards solid mate, it'll monster through most things, NFS not so solid.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Halley's Comet
    Posts
    197
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Dottorrent's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8H61m-LE Rev3
      • CPU:
      • Intel pentium dual core G620 @2.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x2GB Kingston hyperX @1333MHz
      • Storage:
      • Seagate Barracuda SATA I 160GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte Radeon HD 7770
      • PSU:
      • OCZ CoreXStream 500W
      • Case:
      • Antec Three Hundred Two
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 ultimate 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" LG Flatron monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin media

    Re: well that was an anti climax

    Shouldn't there be drivers to improve the stability of Most Wanted already?
    "Nothing is safer than a giant snowball whipping through space...at a million miles an hour"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •