Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 37 of 37

Thread: Radeon 9700 pro - best graphics card ever?

  1. #33
    Scary!
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Woolly Anus
    Posts
    483
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I reckon the Radeon 9500 non-pro as it soft-modded to a 9700pro.

    Best bang for buck in my opinion.

    i opted for a 9700pro anyway but just my two-penneth

  2. #34
    Senior Member Russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    5,201
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    69 times in 44 posts
    u cant soft mod the non-pro 9500 to a 9700pro level, u need a 9500pro

    also, i am selling 1 in for sale and trade for 185 if any1 is interested

  3. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    House without a red door in Birmingham
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Sorry but the 9500PRO can NOT be modded to a 9700PRO at all. The 9500PRO used its own dedicated 128bitDDR PCB from the off so it is not possible to find one with 256bitDDR needed to emulate any 9700 series. The 9500nonPRO on the other hand was made on a 9700PCB for a very breif time after its introduction. If it had the 9700PCB and 128MB it automatically had 256bitDDR so all you needed to do then was enable the dormant 4 pipes (as it was a 9700PCB) and then o/c to (or past) 9700PRO speeds. Chances were tiny though and the 9500PRO is a MUCH better card. You can't physically get 256bitDDR as found on the 9700 series but you could make up the speed deficit between the 9500PRO and the 9700nonPRO as getting from 275/540 to around 350/620 was not uncommon (for any of the 9500, 9500PRO or 9700 which were all clocked to 275/540 by default).

    The things which seperated the cards were 9500=4pipes, 9500PRO=9500+8pipes, 9700=9500PRO+256bitDDR, 9700PRO=9700+fast clocks.

    9700PRO (0.15) 325/310 256bitDDR 8pipes 19.8GB/s 2.6Gp/s
    9700 . . . (0.15) 275/270 256bitDDR 8pipes 17.6GB/s 2.2Gp/s
    9500PRO (0.15) 275/270 128bitDDR 8pipes 8.6GB/s 2.2Gp/s
    9500 . . . (0.15) 275/270 128bitDDR 4pipes 8.6GB/s 1.1Gp/s

    BTW People can get a 9700 for £150 which should exceed 9700PRO perf and get VERY close to 9800PRO speeds ... gee I wonder why ATI ditched the 9700 LOL!

    http://www.kl1128.fsnet.co.uk/vga.htm

  4. #36
    Senior Member Russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    5,201
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    69 times in 44 posts
    yes, but for the extra money for a 97pro you could easily match 9800pro speeds much easier and safer than a 9700

  5. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    House without a red door in Birmingham
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    The 9700 was a 9700PRO clocked lower, very little else seperated them and I haven't heard of anyone who couldn't match 9700PRO speed with a 9700. That was why ATI locked them in the BIOS, they knew what they could do and wanted to maximise sales of the 9700PRO. It was much like the way 4200 easily matched 4400 (now 4800SE) and often exceeded them ... only better for the 9700. If you take things steady (test thoroughly of course) and don't leave it near the ragged edge there is virtually no risk in taking your 9700 PAST 9700PRO speeds. Top card.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •