3DMk 01
10203
xp1800 o/c to 1998ghz @1.65v
1x 512 crucial 2700
Abit Kr7a Raid
Ti4200
I have had better scores but she runs nice and stable with the above settings which I use as my default.
3DMk 01
10203
xp1800 o/c to 1998ghz @1.65v
1x 512 crucial 2700
Abit Kr7a Raid
Ti4200
I have had better scores but she runs nice and stable with the above settings which I use as my default.
Founder of stupidity
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6601223
14135
XP1700+ @ 200 x 11.5
2 x 256MB PC3200
Msi GF4 ti4200 620/310 (64MB 4xAGP)
I'm happy with that!
Used to get about 14k, with the rig in sig, thats 3dmark01. 3dmark03 was quite poor say around 5k i think, if that. hopefully wen i get my board back ill be able to run a 3dmark03 and let you chappy's know.
Schrick is the champ atm, a realistic target to beat none the less, keep them coming, ph33ring the ice cold yank's when the see this thread
3D Mark 2k1 - 20661
If you get a customer, or an employee, who thinks he's Charles Bronson, take the butt of your gun and smash their nose in.
03: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1065715
01: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6776498
need a 9800Xt next.
Best score for 2003:
3407 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1353054
Best score for 2001:
12217 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7015217
Asus A7N8X deluxe 2.0, BIOS 1006
XP1700+ @ 2200MHz (11 x 200)
2 x 512MB TwinMOS PC3200 @ 200MHz/6-2-2-2
Radeon 9600 non pro @ 475 core / 275 RAM
I think I've got a 50/50 chance at the best Radeon 9600 non-pro score here as there can't be more than 2 people daft enough to buy the non-pro over the pro!
20414
Sook Me ...
98765Originally posted by Sweeney!
20414
...
Or another 5 digit number I just happened to type in.
Come on mate - post a link if you've really got a 20K+ score
Edit: Just checked Sweeney's other threads and realised that (s)he's building a system just for benchmark scores so he probably is telling the truth!
Last edited by malfunction; 13-10-2003 at 11:04 PM.
my url's for anyone that wants to compare>
2k1 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7106673
2k3 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1421835
barton 2500 at 2.2 1.75
corsair 3500xms at 220 6,2,2,2 2.8
abit nf7-s v 2.0
9800pro at 411.8, 365
using 3.8 cats
2001 18,709 or 19,000 sumthing with cpu running at 2.3
im not happy lost around three hundred due to cat 3.8, but image quality has improved
ps i have proof in print screens so if someone wants to host pics i can send...
Last edited by kamz; 13-10-2003 at 11:55 PM.
ye i was just about to bury u into the ground for that quick criticisim mal, i built it with him stuff below.
p4 3.2ghz
p4c800e-d
2 x 256 kingston hyperx 3500
sapphire r9800pro 256mb
is the basics, heres the thread...
http://forums.hexus.net/showthread.p...ht=beastiality
and lookie what i found not what he wrote above, must have beat it.
everything else here
http://ironmonkey.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
6106 in 3DMark 2003. Haven't finished my OCing yet though, as I'm sorting out my speakers and arseing around with Blue Yonder, getting my cable sorted.
2600+ running as a 3200+, 512mb of Crucial DDR400 RAM (5.2.2.2), ABit NF7-S nForce 2 motherboard, Sapphire Radeon 9800pro 128mb, OCed a bit.
2k1 - 18636 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6616594
2k3 - 6534 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=904488
not benchmarked since june though, think i could squeeze a bit more out of it now.
Last edited by fondie; 14-10-2003 at 03:16 AM.
We've got roughly the same computers Fondie, apart from my slightly faster CPU.
Where you getting those extra 500 3DMarks from then, huh?
2k1 - 18742
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7108780
sorry fondie
hmm, gfx card maybe ? 461mhz gpu coreOriginally posted by Vaul
We've got roughly the same computers Fondie, apart from my slightly faster CPU.
Where you getting those extra 500 3DMarks from then, huh?
Originally posted by Korky
2k1 - 18742
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7108780
sorry fondie
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)