Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: Just installed a 6800GS... and UT2004 still plays like CRAP.

  1. #17
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    Yeah I recommended it because it can take AGP (and PCIe for when you upgrade later). ASRock are a branch of Asustek (or just Asus, if you've heard of them ) But no worries if you've already ordered.

  2. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chis
    Okay, for my first post... a plea.

    I recently had the pleasure of playing the Unreal Tournament 2004 demo on a friend's Dell Lattitude D810. A laptop with a Pentium 4M 1.7 GHz CPU, 1GB of RAM and an integrated Radeon X600 graphics card. It was also a widescreen laptop, so playing in 1280x1024 with all graphics options on (texture options all set to normal), looked gorgeous and - most importantly - was SMOOTH. 40-50+fps regularly, and this was playing Onslaught online.

    It's not my laptop, so sadly it's had to go back to my friend (I was repairing it ... and I decided that enough was enough and that I would replace my old Geforce 5500 FX with a nice new AGP 6800GS.

    Now, I've tried this card in an Athlon XP 2200 (1.8GHz)-based PC (Asus KT800 mobo, Kingmax RAM), and a 1.9 GHz P4-based PC (SiS 948 chipset or something - it's an MSI P4-MAM mobo, generic RAM). Both with 1GB RAM. In both PCs, Onslaught UT2004 plays like crap. 20-25fps at the MOST. Only with less than 4 players, or when not playing online would I get anything over this, and it's always been like this. Deathmatch is fine, but... I don't like deathmatch! In fact, even in deathmatch and invasion, the moment you get a lot of action on screen the framerate tends to take a nosedive. I really don't remember this happening much at all on the Dell!

    I realise that both CPUs I've mentioned above are hardly cutting edge, but they're both - supposedly - faster than the P4 M CPU in that laptop. I now even have a graphics card which is supposedly also much faster than both my old Geforce, and the X600. Yet it hasn't made the slightest bit of difference.

    PLEASE HELP!


    (P.S. Yes, I'm using Forceware v81.98, and have turned off antialiasing and aniso filtering.)

    Edit: Well, thanks to MSIC I've been convinced of what I feared the most. Old, slow CPUs that just cannot run the game fast enough. *now waiting patienly for his new Athlon 64*
    a.) Have you installed chipset drivers?
    b.) Have you pluged the extra power in to the card?

  3. #19
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hants, UK.
    Posts
    250
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 2 posts
    Well, lets just say I really won't need to upgrade for ages now. This Athlon 64 3400 plays UT2004 VERY well. 50-70fps on most onslaught maps now. OH YEAH!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •