Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    All bought from scan

    plugged together last night
    ASUS P8P67-M rev.3 mobo verses corsair 2X4GB CMX8GX3M2A1600C9
    seasonic 580watt (S12?)
    Antec 100 case
    corsiar SSD

    I have read about EFi and UFI etc but never used it or seen boot sequence

    The PSU powesr up for about 5 secs no beep.
    Shuts down and starts again ( I asume this some kind of intial scrutiny ?)
    then the fans come on , still no beeps and the 2 onboard leds stay on
    The blue one is a standby light , which I am not worried about , (for the moment0
    but the other LED is RAM diagnosis indicator
    the manual advises to hold it down until it starts flashing and allow it to find a compatibile mode for the ram

    I have cleared the BIOS ( or whatever it is called0
    and i have tried the other channel too

    i suspect nothing is broken cause it is all box fresh

    but am i missing something

    All advise gratefully received

    COCO

  2. #2
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,036
    Thanks
    1,876
    Thanked
    3,378 times in 2,715 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 is 1.65v as far as I can tell.

    You need 1.5v for Sandy bridge processors. The Mem OK button might be able to find a mode running 1.5V (it'll just be 1333mhz or something).

    So is the CPU cooler seated correctly (and did you follow the exact instructions as to what order to push down the pins in etc.)?

    You're the second person in a few days to have bought the wrong memory voltage - these things should be researched before buying if you're building a system yourself or you might end up killing a part, which is pricey and almost certainly not covered by insurance if they're fundamentally incompatible parts.
    Last edited by kalniel; 01-06-2011 at 03:10 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    19 times in 19 posts
    • planet436's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2500k @ 4.4k, 1.287V, Noctua NH-U12P
      • Memory:
      • 8(2x4)GB Mushkin 1333
      • Storage:
      • X25-M 80GB, 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 6950 2GB unlocked @ 850/1300
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750
      • Case:
      • NZXT Phantom
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus VW266H @ 1920x1200

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Using 1.65V ram isn't a problem, anything higher will be. Lots ram on the QVL for Asus is 1.65V and you can downvolt it if needed.

    Boot with the minimum amount of connectors, 1 HD, 1 stick of ram, gfx card only. Double check that everything is seated properly and you are installing in the blue slots. Slowly add components as required.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    375
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • camalbitboy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z87-G45 Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4670k at 3.8ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-19200(2400) CAS 11
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 750 Evo 250GB + Plextor 128 ssd + WD Raptor X 150Gb + 1Tb Samsung
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 780ti Zotac
      • PSU:
      • 850W Corsair HX Modular
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell, 2412, Asus ROG Swift pg279q IPS, LG24"tv
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 120Mb

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Quote Originally Posted by planet436 View Post
    Using 1.65V ram isn't a problem, anything higher will be. Lots ram on the QVL for Asus is 1.65V and you can downvolt it if needed.

    Boot with the minimum amount of connectors, 1 HD, 1 stick of ram, gfx card only. Double check that everything is seated properly and you are installing in the blue slots. Slowly add components as required.
    Ah but as the memory controller is now on the chip and not the board thee board memory qvl is pretty irelevant. If the cpu specifies 1.5v any thing above that may not work.
    I tried 2 diff types of 1.65v that crucial recommended for the pro version of that board.
    I eventually went with some 1.5v 1600 corsair recommended by Scan and been fine ever since.
    Last edited by camalbitboy; 03-06-2011 at 12:24 PM. Reason: spelling, stupid smart phone....

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    375
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • camalbitboy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z87-G45 Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4670k at 3.8ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-19200(2400) CAS 11
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 750 Evo 250GB + Plextor 128 ssd + WD Raptor X 150Gb + 1Tb Samsung
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 780ti Zotac
      • PSU:
      • 850W Corsair HX Modular
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell, 2412, Asus ROG Swift pg279q IPS, LG24"tv
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 120Mb

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    .....these things should be researched before buying if you're building a system yourself or you might end up killing a part, which is pricey and almost certainly not covered by insurance if they're fundamentally incompatible parts.
    Easier said than done Kalniel.

    Sandybridge is a fundamental change to how the components fit together (north bridge and memory controller on cpu rather than board etc) and so requires a revised approach to system building. ( Kalniel - I know you know this better than I, I'm just reiterating it for peeps like me that didn't know)

    I have built several systems in the past, not always without issue I'll grant you, but that was a learning process which i had pretty much down pat prior to sandybridge.

    When we (enthusiasts) are used to checking a qvl list for a board and taking it that any chips on there are compatible, its pretty poor for them to not specify which cpu it is in conjunction with. The Asus qvl lists a ton of 1.65v options for their 1155 boards which won't be compatible (within spec)with any i5 cpu's (are even i7 cpu's 1.65v?)

    As far as researching the change , the point is that the changed info isn't exactly well documented. For example no where on the Scan sale page for a sandybridge cpu does it mention that the memory needs to be 1.5v. It doesn't even mention it on the intel page for the chip. The full datasheet just says that it needs to be within .55v of the Vddq, and you have to dig pretty deep to find that and know what that means, and there is no obvious qvl for memory on the Intel site ( I am aware one does exist that just lists about 3 1.5v modules but its not exactly easy to find or complete)

    This is then compounded when you use the corsair (as recommended by scan) or crucial memory configurator which again looks just at the board, which is not the defining factor for memory compatibility in a system anymore, and it comes up with far more 1.65v memory than 1.5v memory options. Crucial for example gave me 3 1.5v options and at least a doxen 1.65v options.

    This approach of using qvl's I have followed for years successfully and neither I (due to it not exactly being clear) nor the business have adapted to the sandybridge change hence all the issues that I, and others are now experienceing.

    It is worsened when you can see professiosnal system builders using 1.65v memory in 1155 boards with i5 sandybridge cpu's successfully, and yet not every 1.65v memory is equal it appears.

    Speaking to a guy at Scan they regularly use corsair 1.65v 1600 vengence memory on these Asus boards with i5 2500k's with no problems, and yet now it appears that other 1.65v 1600 corsair memory isn't compatible at all.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    375
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • camalbitboy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z87-G45 Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4670k at 3.8ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-19200(2400) CAS 11
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 750 Evo 250GB + Plextor 128 ssd + WD Raptor X 150Gb + 1Tb Samsung
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 780ti Zotac
      • PSU:
      • 850W Corsair HX Modular
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell, 2412, Asus ROG Swift pg279q IPS, LG24"tv
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 120Mb

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Having just looked at Scan's site they use exactly the same memory as the op in their p67 system as an upgrade option (admittedly not on an Asus mobo) , so it should work according to them. What does Scan have to say about it?

  7. #7
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9


  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Thanks everyone.
    I did lots of research , an hour on thermal paste placement alone
    ( last year i used twin parellel lines on a Q6600 coz of advice and it had separate phys. cores - caused a clear 3mm bubble still got to 3.4)

    I knew that vengence dimms have clearence problems on silver arrow HS
    In the end I bought a 212+ cause ever forum raved about the value aspect - heartily agree
    the Manual lists many other ciorsair dims but not mine
    These dimms will all boot at 1.5v on 1333mhz I strongly suspect - DDR engineer spec requirement i I assume anyway - don't think i could have blown a aprt if i tried

    Hey , I even researched here - http://forums.hexus.net/help-technic...y-timings.html
    kalniel's post had me running to the manual looking for ram voltages jumpers
    Of course , i could relax I could only kill this part in the bios settings

    Last year i had my ram at 2.1 and clocked at 955mhz down from 1066mhz ( neverworked out why)

    This year it seems ram is no longer a constraint , more a luxury

    What was wrong ?

    after reseating the board and removing all drives , i tried a back up GFX card
    Viola ! up comes the much vaunted UEFI
    the GFX card was a gigabyte 4870 from 2008 - i could even hear the firmware rev up the fan as a test - but something was wrong - nm

    Back into the Antec 100 with backup card

    got a 140/120 in and a 140/120 out - 26/25/27/23degs

    all good

    COCO

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    19 times in 19 posts
    • planet436's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2500k @ 4.4k, 1.287V, Noctua NH-U12P
      • Memory:
      • 8(2x4)GB Mushkin 1333
      • Storage:
      • X25-M 80GB, 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 6950 2GB unlocked @ 850/1300
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750
      • Case:
      • NZXT Phantom
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus VW266H @ 1920x1200

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Glad you fixed it , does that board not have LEDs which light up if there are boot problems indicating which component it is? The PRO version does and makes it easy to troubleshoot.

  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    No leds, No Vcore either ( well none I could see)

    followed this guide
    http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/overc...beginners.html

    got to 4.5Ghz
    Stays up for 2.5 hours of PRIME95 , I think that is fine , for the moment

    COCO

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    19 times in 19 posts
    • planet436's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2500k @ 4.4k, 1.287V, Noctua NH-U12P
      • Memory:
      • 8(2x4)GB Mushkin 1333
      • Storage:
      • X25-M 80GB, 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 6950 2GB unlocked @ 850/1300
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750
      • Case:
      • NZXT Phantom
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus VW266H @ 1920x1200

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    You can also OC using offset voltage rather than manual. The official ASUS thread on hardocp has some interesting posts on how to do this. Main benefit of using offset is you will idle with much lower voltage and only bump it up when under load.

    I've found IntelBurnTest stresses the CPU more than prime does and produces higher temps. I've had instability within a few minutes of running it that weren't picked up in prime for an hour.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • roachyuk's system
      • Storage:
      • Intel 510 120gb ssd...6tb storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 580GTX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750
      • Case:
      • HAF 932
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP LP2475w
      • Internet:
      • Virginmedia 50meg

    Re: ASUS P8P67-M verses corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9

    Thanks only just signed up as receiving my sandybridge today and that link is helpful thanks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. WARNING! Asus Star Ice incompatible with Asus A8V Deluxe & Corsair Twin-X Pro
    By GingerNinja.net in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 06-03-2007, 07:51 AM
  2. Corsair to produce memory optimised for ASUS
    By Steve in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 27-09-2005, 01:18 AM
  3. Best Corsair RAM for Asus P4C800-E ?
    By solrak in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 19-08-2003, 12:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •