Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: What's my bottleneck and what's the best upgrade path?

  1. #17
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: What's my bottleneck and what's the best upgrade path?

    for my 2 cents, if your pc is used mainly as a home cinema pc, i would go for an intel T series chip (much lower power consumption)

    for AES support you will need an I5 or above

    as a cpu benchmark i don't have a good one but i do have one - my sandy bridge 2100T stock does appx 3000kbps using the winrar benchmark , i'm not sure what your current rig can achieve but going by this i think the current generation haswell i5 T series process will be significantly faster

    the cpu onboard graphics will be more than enough too (unless you want to game)

  2. #18
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: What's my bottleneck and what's the best upgrade path?

    Quote Originally Posted by hardwareguy15 View Post
    the cpu onboard graphics will be more than enough too (unless you want to game)
    Quote Originally Posted by koocha View Post
    Forgot to mention that because it's an HTPC I run everything through my HD TV, so all gaming should be done at 1920x1080
    *ahem*

    I'm currently running a 3 generation old A6-3670k as my HTPC, which also doubles as a family gaming machine (TF2, XCom, Skyrim etc.) and it handles all of those at 1080p low settings relatively easily.

    A Richland or Kaveri A10 will be a bit better than the Q6600 in the CPU department, but will definitely be slower than an HD4890 in games. OTOH, you get much better instruction support, DX11, and - importantly for an HTPC (IMNSHO, anyway) - *much* lower power consumption. Your current rig at idle will draw more power than an APU rig running flat out. If you actually want a performance upgrade you still need a discrete GPU - a Radeon 7790/R7 260X would do the job (they're basically the same card), or the 7850/R9 270 would be a big jump. Really it's down to whether it's more a gaming machine or an HTPC - you can go for a cheap, small, quiet (although you'll need an aftermarket cooler rather than the AMD stock one), low power HTPC that's "good enough" for gaming, or spend more on a small but powerful gaming rig that you happen to use for HTPC duties.

    If you're looking at Kaveri you'll definitely want DDR3-2400 capable memory, and perhaps even faster: the relatively large GPU portion is going to need all the memory bandwidth you can throw at it on a dual channel DDR3 platform. No matter how fast the DDR3 you throw at it memory's still going to be the deciding factor in how fast Kaveri's GPU is. But it all depends on how important gaming is and what you consider acceptable performance.

  3. #19
    mutantbass head Lee H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    M28, Manchester
    Posts
    14,204
    Thanks
    337
    Thanked
    670 times in 579 posts
    • Lee H's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 Carbon Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 8700K Unlocked CPU
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 LPX
      • Storage:
      • 250GB 960 EVO + a few more drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 6GB Palit GTX 1060 Dual
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W Modular Blue
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T White Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 PRO
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Asus MX279H & 24" Acer 3D GD245HQ + the 3D glasses
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media

    Re: What's my bottleneck and what's the best upgrade path?

    If you can, try upping the FSB on the Q6600 from its lowly 266 MHz to either 333 MHz or at a push even 450 MHz (you might need to drop a multiplier so it's running at 3.6 GHz)

    I did this with my Q6600 and found that it expanded its lifespan a little, but the design of the CPU with the FSB is what's holding it back.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •