Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 36 of 36

Thread: Analysis - ATI Radeon HD 4850 - benchmarked against mid-range and high-end GPUs

  1. #33
    Out of the Loop
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Staffordshire
    Posts
    1,036
    Thanks
    140
    Thanked
    52 times in 42 posts
    • vrykyl's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG X570 Strix-E
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3900 @ 4.5ghz 1.28v (Noctua DH15)
      • Memory:
      • 32gb (2x16gb) Crucial Ballistix 3200mhz @ 3800mhz 1.35v
      • Storage:
      • 1tb Corsair MP600 NVME, 256gb Samsung Evo, 4tb WD Red
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC 10gb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX 860w + White Braided Cables
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T White Limited Edition (Soundproofed)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 49" CRG9 Ultrawide 5120x1440 @ 120hz
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80mb fibre (80/20)

    Re: Analysis - ATI Radeon HD 4850 - benchmarked against mid-range and high-end GPUs

    I have never bought more than one gpu, and wont anytime soon - its excessive and not neccessary. Whilst an nvidia gx2 or ati x2 card (dual core single card) would not be out of the question, as neither card require more than one slot, or any specific brand hardware.

    You cant say that anyone buying on of these cards will have an sli mobo if they buy nvidia, or a crossfire capable board for ati - most people dont buy dual cards.

    Fine if you are reviewing cards in sli vs crossfire, have x48 for ati and 790i for nvidia - thats a justifiable difference in subsystem......but if your doing single card benches keep the subsystem the same.
    If you need 'comparable' single card benchmark scores for use in an sli/crossfire review - run the tests again on the seperate subsystems.

    Most of your current reader base, if I had to go out on a limb and guess, dont own an nvidia chipset mobo, they will have an intel - and most will have an nvidia card. So testing these new single cards on an intel mobo is actually more relevant to your users anyway, and noone will cry bias or foul play towards one manufacturer or the other.

  2. #34
    SiM
    SiM is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    300
    Thanked
    633 times in 422 posts
    • SiM's system
      • Motherboard:
      • P5K Premium
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8GB PC2-6400 OCZ ReaperX + Platinum
      • Storage:
      • 3 x 320gb HD322HJ single platter in Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • PNY GTX285
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX650W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2407-HC

    Re: Analysis - ATI Radeon HD 4850 - benchmarked against mid-range and high-end GPUs

    Since it hardly makes a difference, I don't think its worth worrying about...

    If all reviews were done in an identical way then what's the point in more than one site reviewing it?

  3. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    524
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked
    67 times in 47 posts

    Re: Analysis - ATI Radeon HD 4850 - benchmarked against mid-range and high-end GPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by vrykyl View Post
    I have never bought more than one gpu, and wont anytime soon - its excessive and not neccessary.
    You might seriously want to go look at the crossfire benchmarks for the 4850, and consider relative costs... you might find your views on this change

  4. #36
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish

    Re: Analysis - ATI Radeon HD 4850 - benchmarked against mid-range and high-end GPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by Rosaline View Post
    You might seriously want to go look at the crossfire benchmarks for the 4850, and consider relative costs... you might find your views on this change
    nod nod... seriously got me tempted..

    Ironically, bagging 260 squids for 2 x HD4850 can get seriously get the 260GTX a run for its money.

    And 260 isn't cheap but its not silly money as 280GTX and the old Ultra turns out to be.. I remembered that I paid almost 240 quid for the great ol X1800XT... so HD4850 isn't too far off the realm of impossibility..

    Then again, I could just get another 8800GT for 100 and run it on the IN9 instead...
    Me want Ultrabook


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ATI Radeon HD 2900 Pro HIS
    By burtie in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-10-2007, 09:00 PM
  2. NVidia Mid range response to ATI
    By Stringent in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-10-2003, 05:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •