Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    Intel's low-power Atom processor may be running rampant in the netbook space, but UK-based hosting company, Bytemark, has other ideas.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    hehe, that motherboard looks like it could get lost in that case
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  3. #3
    Senior Member kopite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,499
    Thanks
    81
    Thanked
    158 times in 127 posts
    • kopite's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 2500K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz Corsair Memory Vengeance Black
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Crucial m4 for main drive. 3.5 TB of storage space over western Digital Drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte NVIDIA GTX 970 G1 Gaming Edition
      • PSU:
      • 750W ANTEC TRUEPOWER
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1 x 27 inch dell Monitor 1 x 20 inch Dell monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin media 150MB

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    Bytemark are a great company

    Used them for a few years for hosting and they where spot on

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    hmm..

    The question is ... Is that a better deal than this?..
    http://www.poundhost.com/dedicated-servers?id=4

    2.4Ghz Celeron vs 1.6Ghz Atom?.. Which one is going to perform better?

    The Celeron server is cheaper, but no mention of Traffic usage on ByteMark though?

  5. #5
    Pseudo-Mad Scientist Whiternoise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    4,274
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked
    386 times in 233 posts
    • Whiternoise's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI LANPARTY JR P45-T2RS
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR2
      • Storage:
      • 5.6TB Total
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD4780
      • PSU:
      • 425W Modu82+ Enermax
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08b
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 23" IPS
      • Internet:
      • 1Gbps Fibre Line

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    Begs the question though, would it be cheaper simply to buy a low end atom system properly and get some decent web hosting?

    I mean lets see how much this is costing, 200gigs, 2gigs of ram, and a dirt cheap processor (hell you could get a Pentium D.C. for that money), you could get the lot for under 125 including the case. Sure you might pay a bit over for the first year, but after it'd be cheaper i reckon. Although i guess the upload rate would suffer a bit?

  6. #6
    DR
    DR is offline
    on ye old ship HEXUS DR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    HEXUS HQ, Elstree
    Posts
    13,412
    Thanks
    1,060
    Thanked
    841 times in 373 posts

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    How much do you think it costs to co-locate Whiternoise?

    Also where can I get rack mount chassis as cheap as you say?

  7. #7
    Pseudo-Mad Scientist Whiternoise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    4,274
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked
    386 times in 233 posts
    • Whiternoise's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI LANPARTY JR P45-T2RS
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR2
      • Storage:
      • 5.6TB Total
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD4780
      • PSU:
      • 425W Modu82+ Enermax
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08b
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 23" IPS
      • Internet:
      • 1Gbps Fibre Line

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    I have no idea to be perfectly honest..

    And i was suggesting just bung it in a normal case, but i have no idea about home hosting so ignore the above It just seems a bit expensive for a system that seems incredibly cheap.

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Headlines - Bytemark finds another use for Intel's Atom: dedicated servers

    Quote Originally Posted by Whiternoise View Post
    Begs the question though, would it be cheaper simply to buy a low end atom system properly and get some decent web hosting?

    I mean lets see how much this is costing, 200gigs, 2gigs of ram, and a dirt cheap processor (hell you could get a Pentium D.C. for that money), you could get the lot for under 125 including the case. Sure you might pay a bit over for the first year, but after it'd be cheaper i reckon. Although i guess the upload rate would suffer a bit?
    What if it goes down? If it's your personal website, whatever... But if it's a company using the internet for business, you better have redundancy in the form of hardware and connectivity.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-06-2008, 01:50 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-06-2008, 05:01 PM
  3. Headlines - Intel may increase Atom output
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-05-2008, 01:14 PM
  4. Renting dedicated servers - which host?
    By eldren in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-11-2005, 01:40 PM
  5. Dedicated Linux Servers
    By Spud1 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-02-2005, 01:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •