Not really. Unless all of them produce x86 processors, you'll have a nightmare getting all of your software to work.
Not really. Unless all of them produce x86 processors, you'll have a nightmare getting all of your software to work.
As AMD have been demonstrating over the past year the cost involved is too huge for companies to just jump in willy nilly and create chips which may or may not work well. It would do wonders for Intel's business though.
AMD have been chasing Intel since they joined in the x86 race and havn't got very close to them.
Don't forget little VIA, which nVidia have a small interest in. They've targetted some smaller markets like POS where they have succeeded very well and SFF PC's. In one major case they have done a cheeky back hander and managed to convince Toshiba to change their top range POS from Intel to VIA. AMD is completely absent from the POS market.
IMHO AMD wont be here in 2 years if they keep up their current efforts. Missing out on key markets is really bad management. The only brands going for them at the moment is Opteron and ATi.
I don't know where you get your facts from but you are very wrong.
AMD Geode
AMD have been on top before AFAIK, the old Athlon cpu's were better in clock/performance ration compared to Pentium 4's and along with the x2 was better than the Pentium D's and now they lost it to core 2, they can get back if they work at it. If they can bring these 3ghz quads at a decent price then they would of won id think.
The X2's and Athlon 64's compared to the Prescott's ect...... I think there may be a fanboy or two in here.
I started out back in the day with a 100mhz Intel P1... nothing special.
Then moved onto a PII 400Mhz megadrive cartridge (someone correct me on socket type!)
Then onto an 800Mhz PIII.... wow what a difference.......
Then along came... AMD! My next chip was an Athlon XP 2500+..... I was the dogs danglies. I had one with blown bridges so when you upped the FSB it got detected as a 3200+
After that I went to an AMD Athlon64 3000+ Clawhammer.... once again ran very cool and very good performance.
Then took the plunge into an Athlon X2 4600+. Ran a beauty.
Then..... the day came where the benchmarks spoke for themselves. Now I'm running a Intel Q6600 overlocked to 3.6Ghz on air.
It's all about whoever gets it right.... and at the moment.... Intel have it bang on. I will never become a fanboy.... the benchmarks always speak the truth! At the time of my next upgrade I can't say whether it will be AMD or Intel.... depends what gets pulled out of the bag.
"In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."
Ahhh, good old Slot 1, another instance of Intel saying one thing and then doing something else...
AMD may have had an offering in the POS market but no one was willing to take them up. Toshiba, HP, PC-POS, Aures, Epson..... to name but a few of the most popular POS hardware brands all designed and still design Intel or Via based systems.
The Geode failed because no one wanted the technology, they even closed the Geode offices.
The final Geode was based on an Athlon XP in some desperate hope that they would sell some.
AMD are fairly well absent from the POS market at the moment.
The lack of serial ports on the geode wont have done them any favours. The POS market is still heavily flooded with serial based peripherals.
Of course Geode 'has serial support', most of the board vendors put serial chips on their boards, why do you insist in talking about something you know nothing about?
The technology is sound, it's fully x86, it's cheap, it has netboot support, it has serial support, and it's more than enough to power a PoS terminal.
Last edited by pow1983; 26-11-2008 at 11:20 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)