Read more.Long-standing Sky+HD customers will soon be getting their hands on Sky's upgraded electronic programming guide.
Read more.Long-standing Sky+HD customers will soon be getting their hands on Sky's upgraded electronic programming guide.
If I was a Sky subscriber, this alone would make me upgrade to an HD boxWhilst remaining familiar with Sky's trademark shades of blue, the guide now displays a small video of the current channel - allowing viewers to see what else is on or make changes to their recording schedule without disrupting their viewing.
Thats because you've not used it.
Sky has far too many channels of utter **** that you need to page through, this makes it much harder because only 50% of the screen is used. You can't seam to change that.
The menu system suffers from aspirations of greatness, it tries to be smooth and cool, this means it takes a long time, even moving time with the search and scan banner, they added this fade slide animation, purely to make it take longer.
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
it's just something i really miss from my MP system whenever I use a Sky box. I hate their standard EPG.
Its just to damn slow, you have only 6 rows of infomation
If they had 1080p hardware there, using say 25% of the screen for the Title and Picture, then 75% of the screen for the program listings it would of been really good. But no, no they didn't.
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
The new EPG is a mixed bag.
Some of the new features are awesome and make things much better (current channel viewable in guide, grouped recordings, search facility, ITVHD available via manual tuning, "further info" works via the banner, FF/RW now works properly)
But....it is a bit clunky :S Not being able to scroll up from the top item to appear at the bottom of lists, plus navigating via up/down/left/right to get to the various sections is a real pain.
There was no reasons that I could see why the good features could not have been added to the old "non clunky" system
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
does this mean standard sky customers are left out in the cold and have to stick with the EPG that has been around for like ever?
Yes.
Part of the problem is some of the old Pace boxes are so under speced that they even have problems with all the new channels that have been added in recent years. They run out of memory too easily. This meant that Sky had to re-work how the HD channel EPG data was sent, so there was room for channels those boxes could actually deal with. As sky is treated like a universal platform, there is no way they would push out an update for one type of box that nother would break on.
Actually, they may well have no way to differenciate between the different SD boxes out there.
Hello funkstar,
thanks for the information.
is there any advantage of a standard sky customer asking for a new box?
Nope.
A new SD box might have a better spec than an old SD box, but Sky will design their EPG and software for the lowest common denominator. So a higher spec box is pointless.
This is one of the many down sides to a completely closed system like Sky.
Here, here.
I haven't counted, but I reckon at least 80%, maybe 90% of the channels are, so far as I'm concerned, pure drivel.
The biggest single UI improvement Sky could make, and I might even be prepared to pay for it, is to customise the channels the Guide displays ... because I'd turn most of them off. Not only would it not have to store anything like as much, but it'd make it a damn sight faster finding things I actually do want.
Highspec boxes crash less, move through the menu faster.
My parents had a Sky+ box first generation that was making a truely horrific noise, and had been crashing. By contrast the new Sky+ SD box is much faster. But still makes a nasty sound.
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
i just memorised the numbers for the ones I want. Or at least the rough numbers for the groups of channels I watch (on the rare occation I have a full Sk package in front of me)
Yeah, I know. I'd just like to be able to edit the guide channels and disable the vast bulk of them entirely. I can with my Pioneer HD Recorder and GuidePlus. Then, they don't even come up if you scroll up and down channels with the +/- keys, for instance.
i''m intrigued to see how this plays out
even though it cuts down on the amount being able to view, i know which channels are on which pages and i'm sure i'll learn the same again with the cut down info - its not like i'm scanning each page for the desired channel, i know where i'm going
i reckon the new EPG will be great once i've gotten used to which page my chans will be on now
wonder if it can be applied for..only had HD for about 2 months
also, how do you manually tune in ITV HD ?
edit: n/m, found it
Last edited by Tunnah; 06-04-2009 at 04:31 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)