Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

    Westmere-derived processors said to be on track for mass production later this year.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,878
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

    This is good (and probably in the plan all along), but I really want to know why they are only producing it with the horrible 45nm graphics chip in the same packaging. Why not shrink lynnfield? Problems with the intergrated memory controller at 32nm?

  3. #3
    King of the Juice Platinum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chesterfield
    Posts
    3,769
    Thanks
    713
    Thanked
    89 times in 74 posts
    • Platinum's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99 Deluxue
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 5930k @ 4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32gb Crucial 2400MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256gb Samsung SP941, 1tb MX500 Crucial SSD, 240gb Intel 730 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 Fury OC
      • PSU:
      • 750 Watt Corsair HX
      • Case:
      • Corsiar 750D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • 18Mb

    Re: News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

    Any idea why theres no mention from Intel of 32nm quad cores just 45nm ones and 32nm dual cores with graphics?
    Salazaar : <Touching wood as I write this...>


  4. #4
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,878
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

    Quote Originally Posted by Platinum View Post
    Any idea why theres no mention from Intel of 32nm quad cores just 45nm ones and 32nm dual cores with graphics?
    Intel aren't doing any quads at 32nm. Just two and six core.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Faiakes's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-6700K
      • Memory:
      • G.Skill 3000 C15 - 16GB
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 860W
      • Case:
      • HSPC Tech Station
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 - Fast Insider
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ 32"

    Re: News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

    Probably to push their existing stocks before the transition all their lines to 32nm.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    31 times in 28 posts

    Re: News - Intel's 32nm Nehalem die shrink on course for 2009?

    I'm interested in how the Clarkdale performs as I'm not a PC gamer. As long as the GPU can run HD content, I'll be satisfied, and the cpu will be dual-core too which is also fine.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20-11-2008, 02:53 PM
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 17-11-2008, 02:11 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-11-2008, 03:46 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-10-2008, 11:36 AM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18-09-2008, 03:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •