Read more.It appears as though Android favours dual-core.
Read more.It appears as though Android favours dual-core.
Hmm, I can't help wondering how the Snapdragon S4 will compare to whatever chip that ships in the Galaxy S3. From what little I've seen so far, if the Asus padFone uses the S4 chip then perhaps it'll be quicker than the Exynos4-powered Galaxy S3.
Obviously I don't know, just making some (big?) leaps based on the scanty information out there (1 part fact to 9 parts rumour as far as the Galaxy S3 goes).
Will it matter to 99.999999999% of owners though?
I've yet to find anything to tax my single-core phone....and I do things with it most users do not!
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I believe the HTC One S will ship with the Snapdragon S4 in the UK. I am torn between getting the HTC One S and HTC One X.
I'd disagree with that. My X10 (1ghz snapdragon) was really struggling with some modern games. (It was also really struggling with lack of RAM) - Maybe your phone is a faster single core or you just do less with it than I do? All I know is since getting my galaxy note with a 1.4Ghz dual core (and 800Mb Ram) I wouldn't go back. Sure the actual benchmark speed doesn't matter but i'd still advocate a decent dual core chip is a really good idea in an android phone.
Agree with some of what you're saying, you definitely don't need a dual-core (or worse still, quad-core) to make a phone call, do a little light web-browsing or send a text.
We've got three devices here:
- 1GHz Snapdragon, 384MB RAM (Gingerbread - 2.3.4. I think)
- 1.4GHz Snapdragon, 512MB RAM (Gingerbread - 2.3.6)
- Tegra2 (so that's dual A9 cores@1GHz), 1GB RAM (ICS - 4.0.1)
Device #1 is noticeably slow if you've been running a lot of apps - sometimes the front page UI can take as long as 10 seconds to completely redraw. Latest edition of Angry Birds can bring this to a near standstill.
Device #2 (still single core, but 40% faster) IS noticeably quicker - no perceived lag even if there's a lot of apps been running. Some very slight degradation running my (totally unscientific) Angry Birds benchmark.
Device #3 (the dual core) no UI lag, even if Angry Birds has been run. Easily copes with a high app loading.
So given that experience, I'm insisting on a dual core device as there's nowt more annoying than bashing away on the menus and having to wait for the device to catch up. Do I need quad core? Probably not - but as "cheesemp" says more cores = better gaming device, (which is a slight issue for me seeing as I no longer have a Nintendo DS). My current short-list for this year's contract renewal is Galaxy S3, Galaxy S2, Galaxy Note and Asus padFone. (but if anyone's got any other suggestions then fire away). I wouldn't consider the HTC One X because I don't think I can live with the idea of a fixed battery and memory limitation at the moment.
YMMV of course!
I have been changing my mind every other day as to which I want. The size of the HTC One X is off putting, yet the screen is supposed to be brilliant. The One S is not NFC comptaible but that doesn't bother me too much, my only worry with the HTC One S is the 16gb internal memory. and lack of a SD Card slot. but i am still leaning toward the One S, today anyway lol
What these benchamrks don't show is a Tegra 3 HTC One X. Yes, the Prime has Tegra 3, but that is a different beast.
I'd like to see like-for-like benchamrks.
Perhaps Hexus could provide us with their own tests Cheers guys
Oh, I also think the screen size is excellent. I would actually rather have the screen size of the Samsung Galaxy Note (5.3"). With a Tegra 3. And Window Phone. But alas, not yet.
Last edited by Lord Midas; 28-03-2012 at 11:51 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)