Actually you're wrong - business interest is very relevant to Microsoft's #1 interest - their bottom line! Otherwise why the heck do you think that there's "Enterprise" editions of all those products ... because the boxes look nice?Remember that there's not just the "boxed" editions that businesses buy (yes, I know they're CAL'd these days - or whatever this months description for volume licenses is), but also manufacturers like Lenovo, HP, Dell, etc will steer clear for their bread-and-butter systems - on the whole - because "the demand isn't there".
And here's my question (as a "Windows8=meh" guy) to you - if you strip away Metro, IS there enough new stuff in Windows8 for it to not be deliverable via some sort of mega "service pack"? Or, taking Apple's lead, some kind of paid-for "Plus" pack?
See #3 in this thread - if you've got Windows7 software then unless it's been written specifically for '7 (at a low level, and badly at that) then it'll work fine on '8. Insisting on Metro/MUI is bad enough, but if they also broke software compatibility then they'd get (rightly!) castigated and/or ridiculed.
Although that probably would have been very good news for Linux advocates...![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Remember that there's not just the "boxed" editions that businesses buy (yes, I know they're CAL'd these days - or whatever this months description for volume licenses is), but also manufacturers like Lenovo, HP, Dell, etc will steer clear for their bread-and-butter systems - on the whole - because "the demand isn't there".

Reply With Quote
.


