Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 36 of 36

Thread: News - France seeks over $250 million in back taxes from Amazon

  1. #33
    Actuary & Gamer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    634
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    43 times in 40 posts
    • Champman99's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Aus P8P67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel SB Core i5 2500K @ 4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256GB SSD, Samsung F1 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD/ATI Radeon 7970 3GB
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster RealPower 1000W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T Graphite (White Edition)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3 x Dell U2412M (Eyefinity)
      • Internet:
      • Sky Broadband Unlimited (No FUP!)

    Re: News - France seeks over $250 million in back taxes from Amazon

    I think some blame has to be attached to the governments of the corporate tax havens. Theres something a little bit parasitic about having a ridiculously low corporation tax with the intention of syphoning off a companies operations in much larger countries (I'm looking at you Luxembourg).

    I dont mind so much if you have a low rate to actually attract businesses in, and those businesses generally operate and employ lots of staff in that country. For instance if you look at Google, they genuinely employ a lot of people in Ireland, so you can legitimately claim that the sales in the UK are genuinely generated in Ireland / The US. This is I think what people are fundamentally arguing about, where is the sale generated, Google claim that the development and software that lead to the sale are legitimately developed in America, and hard to argue with that. But can Amazon really legitimately claim that the British sale is "generated" in Luxembourg?

    I dont see any way round this though unless there is a massively worldwide agreement on corporation tax, an then if you were a small country that massively benefits from being a tax haven why would you agree to this. I almost think you have to do away with corporation tax completely and hope that in doing so companies start employing people where they generate sales, and therefore you get the tax from Income Tax / NI. Its very difficult.

  2. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Suffolk
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    17 times in 10 posts
    • mark22's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock Z68 extreme4
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500k @4.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB GSkill PC16000
      • Storage:
      • Crucial C300
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 6950 oc
      • PSU:
      • Antec truepower
      • Case:
      • Antec 902
      • Operating System:
      • Win 8 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq 24" LED

    Re: News - France seeks over $250 million in back taxes from Amazon

    Quote Originally Posted by Champman99 View Post
    I think some blame has to be attached to the governments of the corporate tax havens. Theres something a little bit parasitic about having a ridiculously low corporation tax with the intention of syphoning off a companies operations in much larger countries (I'm looking at you Luxembourg).

    I dont mind so much if you have a low rate to actually attract businesses in, and those businesses generally operate and employ lots of staff in that country. For instance if you look at Google, they genuinely employ a lot of people in Ireland, so you can legitimately claim that the sales in the UK are genuinely generated in Ireland / The US. This is I think what people are fundamentally arguing about, where is the sale generated, Google claim that the development and software that lead to the sale are legitimately developed in America, and hard to argue with that. But can Amazon really legitimately claim that the British sale is "generated" in Luxembourg?

    I dont see any way round this though unless there is a massively worldwide agreement on corporation tax, an then if you were a small country that massively benefits from being a tax haven why would you agree to this. I almost think you have to do away with corporation tax completely and hope that in doing so companies start employing people where they generate sales, and therefore you get the tax from Income Tax / NI. Its very difficult.
    Or... stop people relying on benefits, realise who makes money, voila grow up. You almost have it with do away with, follow it through.

  3. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    411
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    15 times in 11 posts

    Re: News - France seeks over $250 million in back taxes from Amazon

    The problem with tax havens is that defining them is very difficult.

    Countries raise tax in order to provide govt with money to implement their policies. We do not have the right to dictate the spending plans of foreign countries.

    So if one country has a low tax rate but keeps govt budget in balance and the other country has a much higher rate of tax but, in good times, is running a govt deficit of c.5% of GDP (ie the UK in 2007) which country is the tax haven?

  4. #36
    Actuary & Gamer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    634
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    43 times in 40 posts
    • Champman99's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Aus P8P67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel SB Core i5 2500K @ 4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256GB SSD, Samsung F1 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD/ATI Radeon 7970 3GB
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster RealPower 1000W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T Graphite (White Edition)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3 x Dell U2412M (Eyefinity)
      • Internet:
      • Sky Broadband Unlimited (No FUP!)

    Re: News - France seeks over $250 million in back taxes from Amazon

    Well I think the idea of the tax haven is that it is taking a small amount of tax, but essentially the company that is paying the small amount of tax has no real operations in that country. So the government is raising money to spend on public services yes, but it is essentially siphoning off the operations of companies that another country has for whatever reason chosen to tax highly.

    The point is that the UK has decided that companies should pay 28% or whatever it is on UK profits, and by shifting these profits to Luxembourg, the Luxembourg government and people are facilitating the company doing business in the UK while avoiding this tax, and making some money out of it in the mean time.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •