Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 20 of 20

Thread: News - Nvidia releases Apollo 11 conspiracy busting software

  1. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Majorbugout's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z68P-DS3
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500K
      • Memory:
      • 2x4GB Skill F3-12800CL7-2GBXM DDR3
      • Storage:
      • ST3500418AS (500 GB, 7200 RPM, SATA-II) & ST3320620AS (320 GB, 7200 RPM, SATA-II)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire HD6870 1GB Arctic Cooling Accelero TWIN TURBO II
      • PSU:
      • Jeantec J120F-500AP 500W
      • Case:
      • Antec SX835-II Performance ATX tower
      • Operating System:
      • Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG W2243 22" LCD
      • Internet:
      • BT Unlimited @16.5Mb

    Re: News - Nvidia releases Apollo 11 conspiracy busting software

    Yes, an ARTIFICIALLY created scene proves that the moon landing photo is REAL.

  2. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: News - Nvidia releases Apollo 11 conspiracy busting software

    I love how conspiracy theorists casually omit the fact that astronauts placed scientific apparatus on the moon which reflects light at the same angle it's received at. It's been used for years to calculate the distance of the moon from the earth to the nearest meter.

  3. Received thanks from:

    aidanjt (18-11-2014)

  4. #19
    Seriously casual gamer KeyboardDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,013
    Thanks
    774
    Thanked
    280 times in 242 posts
    • KeyboardDemon's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Sabretooth Z77
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k + Corsair H80 (Refurbed)
      • Memory:
      • 16gb (4x4gb) Corsair Vengence Red (1866mhz) - (Because it looks good in a black mobo)
      • Storage:
      • Crucial M550 SSD 1TB + 2x 500GB Seagate HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 980 SC ACX 2.0 (Warranty replacement for 780Ti SC ACX)
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 750 watt SuperNova G2
      • Case:
      • Silverstone RV03
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus Swift PG278Q
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity (40mbs dl/10mbs ul)

    Re: News - Nvidia releases Apollo 11 conspiracy busting software

    Quote Originally Posted by Majorbugout View Post
    Yes, an ARTIFICIALLY created scene proves that the moon landing photo is REAL.
    It's also known as a simlulation.
    Simulation is the imitation of the operation of a real-world process or system over time.
    This is a commonly practiced and acceptable method used in scientific enquiry, the 'artificially' created scene is modeled on all of the relevant data, such as the dimensions of the landing craft, the materials used in the space suits, angle and relative distance between the moon, sun and earth etc... But just as Vaudane has stated above, conspiracy theorists like to pick the parts of a story their support their own theories and ignore other relevant facts and information.

  5. #20
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    62
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: News - Nvidia releases Apollo 11 conspiracy busting software

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaudane View Post
    I love how conspiracy theorists casually omit the fact that astronauts placed scientific apparatus on the moon which reflects light at the same angle it's received at. It's been used for years to calculate the distance of the moon from the earth to the nearest meter.
    kitt peak observatory can reflect laser light off the luna surface, the light is spread into a 7 klm circle by beam spead and a reflector would not be detectable from the scattered light, the lunar surface is already highly reflective. The only way to prove these refectors work would to have had one bounce back a red-shifted or blue-shifted coherent light beam, and they are simply not large enough to be detected at 104 by 64 cm, now if several hundred had been left this would change matters, NASA could also have drawn a 10 mile diameter logo on the Apollo landing site, perhaps this should be considered in future.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •