Only 2 of those games hit the 60fps magic number for the 4k monitor as well. Cost wise it's not looking worth it. I've got a 290x and for the jump up it's not worth it on bang for buck and I guess i'm the sort of person that the card is aimed at.
Only 2 of those games hit the 60fps magic number for the 4k monitor as well. Cost wise it's not looking worth it. I've got a 290x and for the jump up it's not worth it on bang for buck and I guess i'm the sort of person that the card is aimed at.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
No more than they'd rush out an nVidia card because it's 5% faster or whatever.
Are you saying AMD have come up with a super new core design that's given them this huge increase in speed instead then? That doesn't seem to match with the rumours.Seems 4K still does not require the bandwidth of HBM.......kind of makes HBM pointless....and expensive.
I firmly believe nvidia sales are strong due to driver histories and the press. The recent gamework stories haven't helped either....
Can't tell until we see numbers for lower resolutions and clockspeeds etc......Perhaps HBM is making a big difference......but if it is, then I feel for AMD as that would mean the card is beating a 980Ti by 10% when the 980Ti is crippled by lack of bandwidth. Lower resolution benchmarks will not look as favourable.
I guess we will find out soon enough.......
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I don't think it is as simple as that.
If HBM saves 50W (which it sounds like that is the right ball park), then you can spend that power budget clocking your shaders faster. So it should help if you are shader or power limited. Give it a year, and it can save power and size in laptop form factors. Expensive? Anything new is bound to be, but costs come down over time.
If it was a gimmick, then I doubt Nvidia would be trying to do HBM as well.
Attention Gamers and PC Enthusiasts! Our 24 hour livestream at E3 begins on June 16th, we've got TONS of Prizes and Fun planned for you!
Link
<b>Official AMD Community Rep on HEXUS</b>
Fudzilla are grinding the rumour mill some more
http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphic...e-respun-chips
http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphic...ks-on-the-24th
If this is true and there is a bit more, 'under the hood' other than just a straight forward rebrand then this could be quite interesting. Just like the days of Fermi (480), there was nothing inherently wrong with the performance of the chip but it was a real power munching toaster. The second generation Fermi chip (580) had a lot of these problems reigned in (including unlocking the rest of the cores...)and turned out to be a perfectly acceptable performance boost over its predecessor. Similarly here, there is nothing inherently wrong with the performance of Hawaii and Tonga, so if they manage to improve heat and power usage which allows them to squeeze higher clocks and reduce the noise from the cooler then it should be able to match the GTX980/970/960.
Used to take Fudzilla as a mostly reputable news site, until I realized that 99.9% of his links were to stories he had written previously, with no external links to other reputable sources. And if the commentary below his articles are correct, Faud is wrong as often (or more) than he is correct.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)