Right, except frivolous patents bog down the patent office, and there's every risk of the patent duration being extended again and again under pressure from 'free trade' agreements, so any direct fusion-based propulsion system will likely fall under it and impede development when it becomes actually viable.
Right, this has been getting a lot of very bad reporting.
1) It's a spacecraft engine, not a jet engine. It doesn't intake any ambient air (that would be a a bad idea for low-loss lasing).
2) The fusion pulse is not intended to break even. It's used as a neutron source to pump the Uranium layer.
This is the old Boosted Fission Sail concept, but using pulsed fusion to trigger Fission rather than an antiproton mist (or waiting for natural decay).
Uranium-238 isn't a fissile material, or have I missed something?
This idea has similarities with ion propulsion and the laser initiated fusion. Both technologies in use/being developed.
Therefore it has potential and is definitely worth further research.
Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like A Very Bad Plan?You toss a pellet of fuel into that cavity, and then lasers blast the fuel pellet, causing it to release a bunch of energy (by exploding, fissioning, fusing, or whatever).
No more dangerous than, say, spinning a fan at supersonic speeds, throwing in some extremely high octane gasoline, and tossing in a spark.... which happens in far closer proximity to the general population, on a daily basis, than the proposed idea, which is being developed for space travel.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)