Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 35 of 35

Thread: QOTW: Do you own a drone?

  1. #33
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    385 times in 314 posts

    Re: QOTW: Do you own a drone?

    I think I managed about 2 seconds of airtime with it, which is a shame as she'd spent a fair whack of cash on it.Ashamed to say its sits on a shelf by my PC , taunting me at my lack of co ordination
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  2. #34
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: QOTW: Do you own a drone?

    If you have no RC heli experience, it's kinda like learning to ride a Motorbike by jumping on a MotoGP bike .... a recipe for disaster.

    However .... there's two approaches I'd suggest.

    1) Buy either a very easy heli, of the 'co-axial' type first, or if feeling braver, a 'fixed pitch' type. The first are inherently stable, and suitable for about a five year old. But you will learn elementary co-ordination. The second, the FP designs, are STILL not easy. They're an order of magnitude harder than coaxials, but a couple of orders of magnitude easier than that Nano. Flying FP is still a challenge, but absolutely doable, with time, practice .... and a small collection of parts to repair crash damage.

    2) It IS possible to jump straight into RC heli's with CP (collective pitch) models like the Nano, BUT, in my opinion, it needs to be planned. The approach is to 'detune' the Nano. You DO need a programmable transmitter for this, not the one that comes with the Nano if you got the "RTF" (Ready To Fly) version, because you can then extensively adjust the way the model responds to movement on the controller sticks.

    If you're learning, AND are jumping in the deep end with going straight to CP, then IMHO the Nano is bar far the best model to do it with. Why? Because the very thing that makes it so damn fast and twitchy, the extremely low weight (mass) also makes it very, VERY much more resistant to crash damage. But you REALLY want to detune it if you do that. Then, as you gain in control and coordination, you can gradually turn up responses, rates, etc. And then you have an EXTREMELY fast, agile aerobatic heli capable of just about anything you can think of, and probably quite a lot you've never dreamt of.

    Thing is, the Nano looks like a toy, looks to the inexperienced eye like those learner models the 5 year-olds get. But it isn't. It is, as stated by Blade, for "Advanced" users. If a shop sold your wife that, unless they knew you were already flying other heli's, I'd say she was badly advised.

    Mind you, it has one advantage. Most of the time, if you crash, you can pick it up, put it down right way up, and go again. My bigger models (think three feet or more long, not 7") if you so much a touch spinning rotor blades on pretty much anything, you're looking at (a minimum of) broken linkages and a repair job. Resilient, they ain't.

  3. #35
    Studmuffin Flibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked
    324 times in 277 posts
    • Flibb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-6300
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250G
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3GB MSI Radeon HD 7950 Twin Frozr
      • PSU:
      • FSP
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Deffl TFT thing

    Re: QOTW: Do you own a drone?

    I fly a blade and have built / fly a couple of quadcopters. The use of the term drone comes up quiet a lot on the forums, then again its a bit moot point when loads of companies use the word as part of their name.

    Flight wise the initial setup of multirotors can be tricky, especially for the kit ones, but flying is easy compared to other aircraft. There are a lot of examples of fly aways, but many are put down to user error, mainly not giving the aircraft time to get a proper GPS fix. There are also a lot of options for flight controllers, some are pretty plug and play, others need a lot of setup and customisation. I have a couple of different slight controllers, although haven't had the courage to try out one of the more DIY ones yet.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •