For a minute I thought ...
AMD has announced that it is splitting off its graphics technologies operations into a new unit called
ATi !
This decade seems to belong to the Indians, seeing how so many are CEO's and MD's.
For a minute I thought ...
AMD has announced that it is splitting off its graphics technologies operations into a new unit called
ATi !
This decade seems to belong to the Indians, seeing how so many are CEO's and MD's.
But the DISCRETE part is highly profitable (see NV's quarterly reports for years), where AMD's entire gpu division as a whole...Not so much. This is largely due to the destruction of their market share in the discrete portion of the gpu market. If you show me a smaller market that is highly profitable (and always desired by gamers), vs. a larger market that isn't making squat, I'll take the smaller one every day. Dr. Su is rightly pointing out where the profits are. Console margins barely make enough (and not even considering R&D to get them out the door) to cover interest on AMD's debt if they're lucky (they're not lucky), and margins on APU's are squeezed to death from Intel racing down, ARM racing up. The only place AMD can look to for profit is DISCRETE, and hopefully ZEN soon. It's comic they let Dirk Meyer go instead of listening to him, when they now go back to his strategy. Meaning, making a king gpu and cpu, while the rest (putting them together with apu, expanding to other markets etc) could come once you had WINNERS in your CORE tech. With losers all around (and no profits due to losers), you can't expand into new markets. You need PROFITS, and that comes from king products that have pricing power (see Intel cpus/NV gpus). Both Intel/NV are moving on new markets with...PROFITS from king products. Doing the opposite just increases debt and lowers R&D on core stuff, kills engineer jobs (layoffs) etc. AMD has lost 6B in the last 12yrs. The last time they made any real money was when they had a king CPU.
I just had a look through the quarterly report and nVidia don't say about their desktops. They lump them together with the notebook sales. There's no comment about the size of the desktop market in isolation as far as I can see, but maybe I was reading the wrong report.
Well this is AMD's last resort to last longer
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Thats the thing - the firm owns shares in some pretty large tech companies,so do they know something we don't??
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)