Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 25 of 25

Thread: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

  1. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,129
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    189 times in 160 posts

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Lets face it, there are more 'standards' to USB than any human could ever understand.

    My betting is within a year there'll be another one, with 18 different connectors etc.

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,743
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked
    145 times in 114 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte x570 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD 5900x + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 64GB (4x16GB ) Corsair Vengence 3200mhz @ 3600mhz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1tb SP US75 Boot + Fast 4tb SP XS70 + Slow Raid 0 4tb (2tbx2) with 100gb NVME cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX6800 16GB (XFX SWFT 319)
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 11 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Luckily my 99p hdmi cables pass the same digital signal and same quality as a more expensive one. Unlike the analog days there isn't better colours to be had, if the cable is bad the picture will break up etc.

    As for these cables mentioned it is due to a wrong component which is a rather different issue.

  3. #19
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    The 'Amazon Basics' range seem as good as any, certainly for HDMI and Lightning connectors. So I would expect their USB C to be OK too. The ones tested were sourced from Amazon, but weren't Amazon branded.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  4. #20
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,744
    Thanks
    1,849
    Thanked
    1,444 times in 1,066 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Quote Originally Posted by peterb View Post
    The 'Amazon Basics' range seem as good as any, certainly for HDMI and Lightning connectors. So I would expect their USB C to be OK too. The ones tested were sourced from Amazon, but weren't Amazon branded.
    I use Amazon basics usb3.0 cables and they're fine. Quite good in fact.

  5. Received thanks from:

    peterb (07-11-2015)

  6. #21
    Yay a custom user title! =assassin='s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    896
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked
    57 times in 39 posts

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Handy to know this information for the future, although I personally don't have any devices that make use of the Type-C connector yet. I normally just go off average ratings anyway for products, and make sure that the average is based off a decent number of reviews.

  7. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    223
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    15 times in 10 posts

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    don't disagree, but on cables? Do you really expect that 99p HDMI from a 3rd party seller "genuin in UK, fast shipng" to give you a proper TV image compared to the shielded £9.99 one from a reputable seller?
    Do you really expect a £9.99 "shielded" cable to give you a proper TV image compared to a $249 UltraHD™ Black Platinum Ultimate High Speed Triple Shielded MONSTER CABLE® with Performance Indicators and Loaded with Precision Monster Technology?

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    I use Amazon basics usb3.0 cables and they're fine. Quite good in fact.
    Same, however USB-C is a slightly more demanding spec, what with 100w power delivery and alternate mode and what not.

  8. #23
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,881
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Quote Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
    Do you really expect a £9.99 "shielded" cable to give you a proper TV image compared to a $249 UltraHD™ Black Platinum Ultimate High Speed Triple Shielded MONSTER CABLE® with Performance Indicators and Loaded with Precision Monster Technology?
    If you're talking digital, yes, of course.

  9. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    361
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • anselhelm's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
      • Memory:
      • 2x16GiB Crucial 3600MHz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 1x WD Gold 10TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI RTX 2070 Super w/ Morpheus II
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM750x
      • Case:
      • Corsair Carbide Air 540
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • MSI OPTIX MAG272QR
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Quote Originally Posted by plexabit View Post
    I'm not a fanboy, but you have to realize that Apple products have excellent build quality--much better than most Windows products. The only ones that have really come close are the XPS line, the new Book line, and the Razer Blade--and what do you know? You're paying the same if not more.
    Unfortunately you're misinformed.

    Firstly, please advise of the precise Microsoft products to which you are referring that have shoddy build quality. Please note that another manufacturer shipping a device with Microsoft software does not count. (In other words, it must be a first-party Microsoft product.)

    Secondly, please google Apple Staingate and still honestly tell me that Apple's products (which is to say products that are both built by Apple and powered by their software) are categorically higher quality than specific other brands. (If you look further, you will also find multiple issues with generations of iPhones, iPods and their branded cables, which are frequently brittle.)

    I'm not a Microsoft fanboy, nor am I an Apple hater, but to correlate the higher prices that Apple charges with higher quality is not backed up by evidence.
    Last edited by anselhelm; 09-11-2015 at 02:12 PM. Reason: typos

  10. Received thanks from:

    nichomach (10-11-2015)

  11. #25
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,466
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,649 times in 1,310 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Google engineer finds most USB Type-C cables aren't built to spec

    Quote Originally Posted by anselhelm View Post
    Unfortunately you're misinformed.

    Firstly, please advise of the precise Microsoft products to which you are referring that have shoddy build quality. Please note that another manufacturer shipping a device with Microsoft software does not count. (In other words, it must be a first-party Microsoft product.)
    That's a pretty arbitrary restriction that's got little to do with what plexabit was talking about. If we're talking about laptops, then naturally you can't restrict the conversation to MS-branded hardware.

    And for what it's worth, when it comes to laptops, as much as I despise Apple I don't think I've seen anything as sturdy as the Air.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •