Read more.Products featuring the Pascal GPU will start to ship in volume next year.
Read more.Products featuring the Pascal GPU will start to ship in volume next year.
NV..LINK...3D MEMORY...yawning...GDDR5 is still very fast the only problem is the under performing cores. Lets see if the next fastest CUDA core will beat the Fiji core with its 4096 Shading units that currently beats any core made by man in floating point math performance
That's not what AMD found.
You might want to revise that statement (2.91TFlops DP for Tesla K80, 2.62TFlops DP for Firepro S9170. The best fiji can manage is 0.5)Lets see if the next fastest CUDA core will beat the Fiji core with its 4096 Shading units that currently beats any core made by man in floating point math performance
What a piece of fluff
Wish there was some real information there.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Not sure if you're being serious or if you truly think the only job a GPU does is floating point maths?
Also if GDDR5 is still fast enough then how do explain the advantage that AMD gain at higher resolutions when using HBM (technically the same thing as 3D Memory) on their Fury cards?
On a more serious note, does anyone know if NVLink is going to be a consumer grade interconnect or is it only going to be limited to HPC and SLI?
I was thinking in terms of a faster bus (more bandwidth) between the GPU and the rest of the system (CPU & RAM), that's unless I've totally misunderstood what NVLink is, isn't it a replacement/substitute for PCIe.
We want real world test before I believe the hype
Earmarked for 2016? Pfft, i'm definitely not going to be one of the early adopter testers for that *new* technology. It just reeks fanciful thinking to me that looks amazing on paper but real world adoption is going to have the human factor smeared all over it.
I'd rather see what AMD have learnt from HBM v1 and how they are going to push the envelope with v2
I guess so, I wasn't sure on the benefits for one card systems. For consumers I'd expect them to stick to PCI-E unless they are so sure of their add-in board dominance they can break away - so I'd expect something either piggy-backing PCI-E or physically routing between cards, but you're right in that at least one diagram shows the link between CPU and card as well.
For tech enthusiasts there sure are some misinformed people around, that *new* technology you speak of isn't new and it isn't fanciful thinking.
And if your waiting for AMD to push the envelope with HBM2 your going to be sadly disappointed, HBM2 just increases the size of the chip from 2Gb per stack to 4Gb.
Nvlink is new as in commercially available but we can debate the semantics of the hardware release schedules and development cycles another time.
Hbm v2 isnt just about size of the 3D chip, its also about the improvements of the interaction between the memory and the core itself and increasing/enhancing its throughout.
So what would these "improvements of the interaction between the memory and the core itself and increasing/enhancing its throughout" be?
Everything I've read about HBM2 says it's just a doubling up of what HBM1 is, and what Nvidia is calling 3D memory is effectively HBM2, I'd be very interested in more details though if you could provide some links showing that's not the case.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)