Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    29,549
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,928 times in 670 posts

    USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    So it has announced the USB Type-C Authentication specification.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Monkey Apex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    4,330
    Thanks
    793
    Thanked
    180 times in 115 posts
    • Apex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87M-PLUS
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-4670K
      • Memory:
      • 16 GiB
      • Storage:
      • 6.0 TiB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R9 480X
      • PSU:
      • 750
      • Case:
      • Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2410 24"
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb nTL Cable

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    Should have been in the spec from the start not a add on feature.



  3. #3
    <Insert witty one liner> Kanoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    803
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked
    77 times in 53 posts
    • Kanoe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z9PE-D8 WS
      • CPU:
      • 2x Intel Xeon E5-2667v2 @ Stock
      • Memory:
      • Samsung ECC RDIMM DDR3 PC-14900 128GB (8 x 16GB) @ Stock
      • Storage:
      • 240GB SSD, 960GB M.2, 960GB M.2, 960GB SSD, 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Sea Hawk X 1080Ti (@2050/1501)
      • PSU:
      • Superflower 1200W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Primo v2
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 28" ASUS PB287Q 4k + 24" Dell U2412M
      • Internet:
      • VM @ 500/30

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    I'm not sure about this.

    It almost feels like it could be used by a company, like Apple for instance, to ensure that only official, Apple, made / sold cables / chargers can be used with an Apple product and it would reject any 3rd party cable (even it was to spec) because it had been locked to a certain certificate.

    Happy to be proved wrong.

  4. #4
    Now 100% Apple free cheesemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near the New forest
    Posts
    2,378
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked
    154 times in 108 posts
    • cheesemp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570k @ 4.2
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Crucial Ballastix Elite DDR3 @1866
      • Storage:
      • 64Gb M4 + 240Gb arc100 + 500Gb TcSunbow SDD (for games only) 1x500Gb HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 480 8Gb Nitro+ OC (with auto OC to above 580 speeds!)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650W Semi modular
      • Case:
      • NZXT Source S340 Mid Tower
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32" QHD AOC Q3279VWF
      • Internet:
      • FTTC ~30Mb

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    I can see the reasons but I hope its not just an excuse to charge more. I've done well with £2~3 USB cables in the past and never had an issues. I won't be pleased if I have to start shelling out £10+ for a basic charging cable.
    Trust

    Laptop : Lenovo G505s A8-5550m 8Gb 240Gb SSD Radeon HD 8550G + Radeon HD 8570M dual graphics

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,891
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    110 times in 93 posts

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanoe View Post
    I'm not sure about this.

    It almost feels like it could be used by a company, like Apple for instance, to ensure that only official, Apple, made / sold cables / chargers can be used with an Apple product and it would reject any 3rd party cable (even it was to spec) because it had been locked to a certain certificate.

    Happy to be proved wrong.
    That would happen...
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    82
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • failquail's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI 970 GAMING
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 8120 @ 4.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DDR3 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 120GB SSD, 3x 1Tb HDD RAID5
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD R9 390 8GB
      • PSU:
      • 750W Corsair
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master CM 690 II
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Dell WFP 2408 + cheap 22" LG monitor
      • Internet:
      • 100meg Virgin cable

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    As as has been mentioned already. This is good in theory but could easily be used to lock you in to absurdly overpriced cables from specific vendors...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,589
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked
    210 times in 151 posts

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanoe View Post
    I'm not sure about this.

    It almost feels like it could be used by a company, like Apple for instance, to ensure that only official, Apple, made / sold cables / chargers can be used with an Apple product and it would reject any 3rd party cable (even it was to spec) because it had been locked to a certain certificate.

    Happy to be proved wrong.
    Tbh, it's only a short step from stating in ts and cs that you have to use apple certified hardware else you could void your warranty to allowing it and recording when uncertified chargers/cables are used. That's just protecting your iPhone that they own.

    I'm for this for one reason alone and that is a lot of users aren't technically minded and see "plug, end that fits, it must work", if the device told you this could be dangerous then excellent. Because of numerous past fires which have caused injury or even death. Apple is the least of my worries unless they use this system to make their cables stupidly priced and therefore you have to pay through the ear for it.

    Unfortunately, the human condition of shrugging causes the desire for to outweigh the against.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,682
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked
    136 times in 110 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB, 2TB hard disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 70 Mb/s

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanoe View Post
    I'm not sure about this.

    It almost feels like it could be used by a company, like Apple for instance, to ensure that only official, Apple, made / sold cables / chargers can be used with an Apple product and it would reject any 3rd party cable (even it was to spec) because it had been locked to a certain certificate.

    Happy to be proved wrong.
    Already been done with ink cartridges

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    145
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    Thunderbolt does this already. Further proves TB3 is USB 3.1 done properly.

    Oh and generic but still certified TB3 cables are only around £18, thats hardly breaking the bank for peace of mind with a cable that wont kill your USB/TB controller or the PC itself.

    Apple products always have the extra Apple tax on top.

  10. #10
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,504
    Thanks
    547
    Thanked
    1,111 times in 948 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    Quote Originally Posted by Kato-2 View Post
    Oh and generic but still certified TB3 cables are only around £18, thats hardly breaking the bank for peace of mind with a cable that wont kill your USB/TB controller or the PC itself.
    I just bought an Asus Transformer tablet/laptop convertable for £150 which comes with a USB C socket. If a cable to put in it costs over 10% of the price of an entire PC, then USB will have lost its way.

    OTOH, if cheap cables just mean that charging is slower because that should still be safe, then that wouldn't be so bad.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,682
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked
    136 times in 110 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB, 2TB hard disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 70 Mb/s

    Re: USB Promoter Group aims to cut risk from dodgy USB Type-C gear

    £18 for a dumb cable is ridiculous - I'd expect silver wire for that much. Are there any logic gates in TB3 cables, or it is just massively overpriced passive components?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •