Read more.To build a "revolutionary microprocessor core to power the next decade of computing".
Read more.To build a "revolutionary microprocessor core to power the next decade of computing".
lol, I think that is exactly the kind of fluff Intel would say about a small iteration on the current technology.I don't think Intel would be saying this stuff about a processor design that merely iterates on the company's current technology.
Quite poss. "We are looking for people to grind out process optimisations to deliver marginal performance gains in consumer and enteprise processors, in a controlled fashion so that we can continue to roll out incremental upgrades to extend the longevity and value of our current IP portfolio over several generations", just doesn't have enough impact...
Everyone should notice that AMD did a serious wake up call to Intel.
Yeah they're like at a "process, architecture and optimisation" model but in practiicality they're on the same core architecture "optimising" it for more than 6 years now...
I'd guess on this being the post-post-Core architecture project. Remember a few years ago when there were rumblings of a new uArch design with 'inverse' hyperthreading (two physical cores that can combine to act as one logical core, either splitting or sharing a job dispatcher)? That'd be the post-Core architecture.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)