Corky34 (23-05-2018)
A) It's more that other people read what other people are saying about you.
B) Blocking them yourself doesn't stop them from broadcasting it to the world and making unwitting bullies of everyone else.
C) Too late, damage done.
Bullying in person means you have to be strong enough to bully the other person and not fear getting smacked in the face for it. Having remote anonymous access to public broadcasting means you can terrorise, bully, defame and generally abuse someone who doesn't even have internet access.
The Fappening.
Private moments from private accounts, not even publicly thrown out on social media, force-hacked and plastered all over the world.
Yes, someone got sent down for it, but this was a massively high-profile case. Other non-celeb people have been hacked, doxed, etc and their lives ruined, and not just through debatably-inadequate cybersecurity, either.
Heck, just look at how the newspapers have always been able to destroy a celebrity just from ambiguously phrasing a mere rumour... which has often proven to be completely fabricated, anyway. But by then it's too late and the damage has been done.
You seriously want everyone to have that kind of access, to spew their vile opinions and spread even more hatred?
What starts as a snowflake 'hate crime' ends up as a recruiting tool for all sorts of insidious things.
Since you yourself are there, in person, for reals, able to address the issue and defend yourself directly. Generally you only attract that kind of scrutiny if you're doing something unusual anyway.
I've done no verification other than what I've picked up over time in news snippets but don't places like Russia, China, or North Korea have laws against homosexuality, political speech, criticising their leaders and things like that?
Also highly undesirable is not the same thing as illegal, although some of the crazy laws and court cases we've seen in recent years do make me wonder at times.
Well if they're able to come and actually arrest me for being gay in their corner of the internet, they're welcome to it... I actually forgot about that element of it. I guess that's perhaps indicative of how far we've come, in that I didn't even think about homosexuality being illegal somewhere?
IIRC, there is/was some EU legislation that made it a crime to criticise the EU. I remember it being discussed around 2010, down the pub! So not that different from criticising their leaders....
Tough, then. Cultural difference. Accept it and embrace the multi-culturalism that is the Internet.
We could always employ a non-profit organisation to take a census...
It should certainly be a consideration, if only a regional restriction. Already individual sites take measures tyo ban, block, restrict and remove certain content, because the people who frequent those sites don't want it... in the same way Motorcycle MC Colours, Football shirts and similar things are banned from certain venues, or persons with criminal records are prohibited from travelling to certain countries. This is not really any different in principle.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)