Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 18 of 18

Thread: Intel's 28-core Xeon W-3175X listed at approx £4,000

  1. #17
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Intel's 28-core Xeon W-3175X listed at approx £4,000

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    I said to support the clocks not overclocks, it has been well established that this processor is not going to sip power...
    Nothing is well established about the W-3175X - we've seen it operational exactly once, under unusual and contrived circumstances. You're basing your assumptions on reports of boards designed for overclocking. The 2990WX doesn't exactly sip power either. Hexus' 4GHz all core overclock pulled > 500W at the wall and spiked the temperature to over 90C.


    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    … 2990WX is base/boost 3GHZ/4.2GHz whereas the the 3175X is 3.1GHz/4.3GHz, an increase of 100MHz will make a marginal increase in performance. …
    You can't directly compare the Intel and AMD clock speeds because the IPC isn't the same. I was comparing the W-3175X to the 7980X, where the base clock difference is 2.6GHz to 3.1GHz. And as I said, the 7980X gets close to the 2990WX in some tests. The W-3175X has a > 50% core increase and ~ 20% base clock increase compared to the 7980X - that could potentially make it 80% faster than the 7980X. The 2990WX is not 80% faster than the 7980X across the board.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    … The 2990WX is a better bet for both expense and capabilities, but it is the obstinant mindshare that is the problem ...
    While I don't disagree that on balance the 2990WX is better overall, there will almost certainly be workloads for which the W-3175X is faster. If you're doing one of those workloads the business case is there to be made. It's not just about mindshare - it's about horses for courses.

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel's 28-core Xeon W-3175X listed at approx £4,000

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Nothing is well established about the W-3175X - we've seen it operational exactly once, under unusual and contrived circumstances. You're basing your assumptions on reports of boards designed for overclocking. The 2990WX doesn't exactly sip power either. Hexus' 4GHz all core overclock pulled > 500W at the wall and spiked the temperature to over 90C.
    I'm also basing my assertions on 8180 specifications of which this processor is an 8180 rebadged. There has been also excellent tear downs of both the board and processor capabilities by multiple media outlets so we have a fairly good assertion of the expected specifications.


    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    You can't directly compare the Intel and AMD clock speeds because the IPC isn't the same. I was comparing the W-3175X to the 7980X, where the base clock difference is 2.6GHz to 3.1GHz. And as I said, the 7980X gets close to the 2990WX in some tests. The W-3175X has a > 50% core increase and ~ 20% base clock increase compared to the 7980X - that could potentially make it 80% faster than the 7980X. The 2990WX is not 80% faster than the 7980X across the board.
    Ah, see now you're missing the point here, 32 Zen+ cores at 5GHz is equivalent to 28 Skylake++++ cores from Intel at 5GHz. IPC is NOT the same. We also must remember diminishing returns that as the frequency ramps up on more cores, you may not get the same performance per core.

    Also, to correct your math in two areas:
    -The 3175X does not have a greater than 50% increase in cores, it has a 36% increase in core numbers so even then it is still an increase.
    -Also, the Turbo on the 7980XE actually keeps it operationally under load at 4.2GHz which means the 3175X is only 100MHz faster at peak than the 7980XE but does have a 36% core advantage and a per core single thread advantage over AMD, granted.

    Additionally, as there have been no architectural improvements between any of the 4 past generations from Intel, we can do the calculation on the 7980XE which is (4198/18)*28 giving 6530 which we will add the 2% faster clockspeed at peak which gives 6660. That means, broad estimate, as you're correct no one has it in their hands yet, the 3175X could be up to 28% faster than the 2990WX due to per core IPC improvements over the other and a slight megahertz increase.


    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    While I don't disagree that on balance the 2990WX is better overall, there will almost certainly be workloads for which the W-3175X is faster. If you're doing one of those workloads the business case is there to be made. It's not just about mindshare - it's about horses for courses.
    Horses for course only works if you're not breaking your bank to race that horse.
    Last edited by Tabbykatze; 18-12-2018 at 11:49 AM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •