_______________________________________________________________________
Originally Posted by Mark Tyson
That's pretty high alright, although I'd guess that's much higher than the average. I know there's list of average speeds in certain areas but I've never seen one for pings, higher speeds are fine and all but i doubt the majority of people need anything more than 10Mbps download speeds, given the choice I'd prefer lower pings than higher speeds.
When I had 8Mbit, I was more than happy with it, didn't think much of the 'slow' downloads, moved up to 80Mbit and server allowing can download at around 8MB/s, a literal 10x increase.
When I first made the change I wasn't overly impressed with the increased speed, in a way I was 'expecting more', but after a while you end up like I am now where you get impatient when you see a time of say 30mins to download 15gigs of data...at 8Mbit it would have taken me over 4 hours lol
While I wouldn't say no to faster pings I don't think I'd realistically notice going down from '10ms' that I get these days.
I wouldn't want 10mbps these days, I don't really game online and it'd be no good for UHD streaming. But that's just me.
On a general note, I can't see how this Ghost ISP bunch can make these marketing claims as long as they're running over BTOR's part-copper infrastructure. Look on the forums of any ISP in the same situation and there are plenty of threads from gamers complaining about high pings.
If they can stick to their claims, this might be good, but I doubt it. It seems like there are just no good ISPs in the UK, and I wish things would improve in this country. I'm with Virgin Media currently and am sick of how often the connection just goes down entirely. It's so unreliable! And even when it works, half the time I don't get the proper speeds or suffer from packet loss. And don't get me started on the Super Hub router... I'll welcome any new ISPs.
Now, I know I'm not the intended audience for this product, what with me not living in the UK and all, but such things have never stopped me from giving unsolicited comments before, so why start now...
First of all, when I saw the story on the frontpage I thought "what a funny looking egg". Only after did I realize it was supposed to be a ghost.
Next, what's with these speeds. At least for fibre 100 MBps should be the minimum. As has been stated above and in the article, the stated ping times aren't really anything special. Neither are the TTL times (which tbh I've never considered important for a low-latency connection).
I know it's a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison, but my bog standard 55/12 MBps VDSL connection here in Denmark is easily able to achieve these figures. Completely without any "gam0rz tuning". And it's always a question of what you try to connect to. The fastest connection at your end doesn't help when the other side is on dial-up.
Which brings me to my last point, "for gamers, by gamers". Really? I'd much prefer "for gamers, by competent network professionals", but maybe that's just me.
Strawb77 (05-08-2019)
_______________________________________________________________________
Originally Posted by Mark Tyson
Having a low latency connection to the ISP gateway does not mean low latency over the rest of the network - latency is cumulative and depends on the eventual path to the end destination. You only have to run tracert to see the path length and the latency per hop.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute
The above illustrates perfectly why their claims of improved gaming would be nonsense even if all their statements are accurate. The whole chain needs to work well for good performance and any one link in it can make it unplayable.
It's also the same reason Killers network devices are pointless.
peterb (25-07-2019)
I only play single-player games, can't wait to see what improvements this will bring me...
Strawb77 (05-08-2019)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)