Intel Core i9-10900K is up to 1.3x faster than the i9-9900K

[DanceswithUnix]

lol I've got an old toshiba sat p30 with a 3.3ghz p4 under the hood too

Clearly better made than the Dell I was thinking of

[zaph0d]

No idea if it still works - it's sat in a cuboard for the last 10 years lol

[FRISH]

Sounds like it's going to be a rough year for intel.

[Xlucine]

In fairness, the base TDP is not that different to what the 9900K actually consumed when boosting

Hmm true, that said it dawned on me though we talking 5% over 10 Core's so 5%/10 = 0.5% per core ouch sounds worse and if there is a Mhz up lift then ouch that might be a negative % on IPC per core. just all the gain from clocking and increased cores. :-/

The improvements multiply, not add, so it's still 5% per core (which could just be a ~200 MHz speed boost)