Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 18 of 18

Thread: Intel Rocket Lake 8C/16T CPUs spotted in Geekbench and AoTS

  1. #17
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,341
    Thanks
    1,682
    Thanked
    1,279 times in 955 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Intel Rocket Lake 8C/16T CPUs spotted in Geekbench and AoTS

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    Tiger Lake's integrated Xe-LP GPU looks like a winner. 30% higher volume than projected.

    That Xe-HP 42TFlop FP32 looks like a winner, too. Installed at Argonne.

    That Xe SG1 4 Xe GPUs on a passively cooled card looks like a winner, too. Tencent agrees.
    oh? Really? Any sources for those? I remember Larrabee. Without wishing to sound like a Thomas, until I have one in my hand and see it in action I will not believe in Xe.

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel Rocket Lake 8C/16T CPUs spotted in Geekbench and AoTS

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    more than not developing a new architecture in a timely fashion despite a distinct competitive advantage for an entire decade?
    There's a difference between stagnation with a good (albeit aging) product than cowboying it. Raja is a smart guy but I don't think he is quite the leadership material without having someone pull on his chain and I expect Xe is only getting so good because the focus has been forced to be on "make the product better" and not "market the product". Intel doesn't need marketing, they need a strong product that is a departure from the time of old.

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    Tiger Lake's integrated Xe-LP GPU looks like a winner. 30% higher volume than projected.
    Any more so than an MX350 or a Vega 11 because that's where the Tiger Lake iGPU is sitting. Not disparaging that it is quite a good offering but it's wildly overstating the "power" of Xe within it compared to its power envelope. If it were that amazing, why is its advertising so muted except when Ryan Shrout is allowed to talk about it...

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    That Xe-HP 42TFlop FP32 looks like a winner, too. Installed at Argonne.
    It's not installed yet, Intel dropped the ball with their 7nm, we have no idea when it's coming and whether the Xe-HP will be even the same. It is also a claim and not a reality, yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    That Xe SG1 4 Xe GPUs on a passively cooled card looks like a winner, too. Tencent agrees.
    That's just 4 Tiger Lake low power 96EU chips, the reason why it's a winner because it's high density low power transcode pipeline, nothing to do with it being a phenomenal GPU. And frankly, being obtuse, it was likely a custom design that Intel is giving away at rock bottom just so they can start getting people to use the darn things because god forbid no one else is touching Xe yet.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •