Single core 1581 pts
Multi core 15158 pts
CPU 5800x
Ram 3600mhz CL18
Msi X570 gaming plus
EVGA RTX2070 super
Single core 1581 pts
Multi core 15158 pts
CPU 5800x
Ram 3600mhz CL18
Msi X570 gaming plus
EVGA RTX2070 super
Single 1292
Multi 12274
3800X
Jon
Single: 1304
Multi: 12898
CPU: Ryzen 7 3700X
Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280
MB: ASRock X570 Extreme4
RAM: 16GB (8GB x2), 3800MHz CL16 (optimised sub timings), FCLK - 1900MHz
It's OK in most situations. Looking at the scores from 3dmark compared to hexus review scores I'm very much as expected.
I don't feel like it's holding me back too much.
There are a couple of games I do worry about due to the very low single core performance and I can see the games only using one core but it's still doing OK.
Duckboy79 (15-03-2021)
Also here's a normalised chart which makes for a more interesting comparison I think. (I've deliberately left the order as before).
Edit: Here are charts sorted by CPU multi/no threads and by CPU single
These show the generational improvement in Ryzen 5000 series over 3000 series in single thread (by 20-25%), but little to no difference in the multi CPU/thread, with the exception of the R7-5800x which seems to show a consistent leap versus both its predecessors and its current siblings, even against the 5950x. *
Compared to the 5950x the 5800x has 96-97% of the single thread performance, while its multicore performance per thread is 20%-25% better in these results. Bang for buck that's pretty appealing, and unless the 5900x comes in similarly performing, then it does give some grounds to people going for a 5800x if they don't need the extra cores.
*Edit 2 - 5600x score will come in v0.3 chart, and shows it performing similarly to the 5800x - it might be this 5950x sample is hitting a thermal limit, TBC if we can get more samples from people using R9-5900x and R9-5950x (and 5700x would be useful too). It could just be the lower clock speed of the 5950 (3.4GHz vs 3.7-3.8GHz for the rest of the 5000x models) holding it back.
Last edited by ik9000; 13-03-2021 at 04:30 PM. Reason: footnote added
Sry missed this on my sweep through. I've added your cooler in, it will show in v0.3 with the next updates. The difference could be down to a variety of things, but the cooling is an interesting one to see. I wish I hadn't turned down the chance to review that MSI AIO in December - I'd love to see how the NH-U14S compares to a decent AIO. Especially now I've worked out the best fans to use with the Noctua (and no, they're not Noctua)
Iota (13-03-2021)
Single Core: 1,595
Multi Core: 15,166 (initial score), 15,562 (score after replacing thermal paste with Kryonaut)
CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X
RAM: 2x16GiB Crucial 3600MHz CL16
Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S with 2x ultra quiet (<16 dBA) Nanoxia fans
Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
Last edited by anselhelm; 13-03-2021 at 04:46 PM. Reason: added additional information
Single Core: 1516
Multi Core: 11509
CPU: 5600X
so adding the 5600x into the mix shows it doing fairly similarly to the 5800x in terms of per-thread and single core performance. I wonder if the 5950x is hitting some kind of thermal throttling.
@Beffa what cooler, mobo, ram are you using with it?
Does anyone have a 5700x and/or 5900x they can add into this (and a 3950x for that matter)?
Last edited by ik9000; 13-03-2021 at 03:59 PM.
Mobo: MSI X570 Tomahawk
RAM: G.Skill Trdent Z Neo 3600Mhz, 64GB
Cooler: Deepcool Castle 360
GPU: XFX Radeon RX 6900XT Merc 319
Case Be Quiet! Dark Base Pro 900.
I will make a few more tests today, I have cleared CMOS and updated Bios because of a missing Bluetooth (Might have been some other things missing too)
Edit on edit:
Single 1635 Max temp 63C (Stock)
Multi 25100 Max temp 54C (Stock)
Tried a few runs with some overclock and hit 29810 at best for multi, could not a better score in single mode with OC
Last edited by beffa; 13-03-2021 at 06:43 PM.
5900X
Single Core: 1,645
Multi Core: 21,892
10700K
Single Core: 1,378
Multi Core: 11,969
Both at stock, they're running optimized for silence not airflow though (mostly closed caes, NH-D15 with ULNA) so they'd probably boost a bit higher in more open cases
Last edited by jamest; 13-03-2021 at 06:55 PM.
On my Xeon E5-2670 0 (8 core, 16 Thread, 2.6Ghz):
Multicore: 5363
Single core 587
MP ratio 9.13x
and my ancient core 2 quad Q9550 (4 core, 4 thread, 2.84GHz):
Multicore: 1234
Single core 401
MP ratio 3.08x
Last edited by JerryTheC; 13-03-2021 at 08:54 PM.
CPU: Intel i5-9600K @3.7 GHz (i.e. stock)
Memory: 3200 MHz, CL16, 16 GB
Motherboard: Asus Prime Z390-A
Cooler: Noctua NH-U12S
OS: Windows 10
Single core: 1060
Multi core: 5419
With an overclock to 4.8 GHz by "Asus AI Overclocking":
Single core: 1225
Multi core 6565
Last edited by AndyM2012; 13-03-2021 at 08:50 PM. Reason: More data.
I'd be really surprised if the single core bench throttles. I was watching my core temps using HWInfo64 when running the single core and it looks like the process for Cinebench was being moved around the different cores while running, not sure if anyone else notices this behaviour if they monitor the core temps. I only noticed it because I was curious what a light overclock would do to my scores (set all cores to run static @4.9 = 12600/1305).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)