Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: Arm shows off its non-silicon PlasticArm processor

  1. #17
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Arm shows off its non-silicon PlasticArm processor

    Ian Cutress does a good analysis of this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waevGf8MPiA



    ARM thinks that one million transistors is tje upper limit of the technology,so it is going to be limited to simple devices. Also,apparently implementing resistors in plastic is not as easy as it appears,and is a limitation.However,it is incredibly cheap to make.

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Daley Thompsons Decathlon - great version of Yellow Magic Orchestras Rydeen when loading though!
    Good to see someone else also knows about YMO!!

  2. Received thanks from:

    DanceswithUnix (26-07-2021)

  3. #18
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,162
    Thanks
    298
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus prime B650M-A II
      • CPU:
      • 7900
      • Memory:
      • 32GB @ 4.8 Gt/s (don't want to wait for memory training)
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5+ 2TB (boot), Crucial P5 1TB, Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Dual 4070 w/ shroud mod
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Gigabit symmetrical

    Re: Arm shows off its non-silicon PlasticArm processor

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Ian Cutress does a good analysis of this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waevGf8MPiA



    ARM thinks that one million transistors is tje upper limit of the technology,so it is going to be limited to simple devices. Also,apparently implementing resistors in plastic is not as easy as it appears,and is a limitation.However,it is incredibly cheap to make.



    Good to see someone else also knows about YMO!!
    The "several orders of magnitude cheaper than silicon" claim would mean a whole microcontroller for less than the cheapest surface mount resistor that RS stock

  4. #19
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,012
    Thanks
    782
    Thanked
    1,569 times in 1,326 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Arm shows off its non-silicon PlasticArm processor

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Also,apparently implementing resistors in plastic is not as easy as it appears,and is a limitation.
    Kind of an interesting video.

    I can't imagine resistors are that hard to make, though with NMOS/PMOS you need a lot of them. But he was pointing at capacitors on the Intel CPU and I can imagine capacitors to any precision will be hard to make.

    Ian's doctorate isn't in electronics

    29mW is a bit of a killer for usability, they need to get a CMOS process working to get that right down or the power cost will dwarf the CPU cost.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •