LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksEverything else I throw at it runs fine so I aren't fiddling around just so this will workOriginally Posted by divinemadness
Everything else I throw at it runs fine so I aren't fiddling around just so this will work
il keep on folding@home too - been doing it for ages now....well over 1000 units done now
Feb 20th; 10:25pm - update on the TV programmes
These have started kicking off now!
The first programme - Meltdown - finished 25mins ago but is set to be repeated at midnight.
The second programme - El Nino - started 25mins ago, finishes at 11pm and is set to be repeated at 1am.
The third program - Five Miles High: Jetstream - starts at 11pm and is set to be repeated at 2am.
Bob
I'd love to watch these programs and see what utter boll*cks they spout about climate change.
To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.
Presumably, you don't have Sky or Freeview, so feel compelled to judge sight unseen, based on the knowledge that the BBC is always total rubbish?
Last edited by Bob Crabtree; 21-02-2006 at 09:34 AM.
No, yes, yes - not to mention the research i've done into El Nino personally.
To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.
Do tell us all about your own personal research.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/feature...o_events.shtml
Cost of £20 billion in damage globally. Cost of $9 billion in the U.S alone. Fails to mention the generation of $19 billion in profits in the U.S. alone.
Cost of over 2000 lives worldwide. Loss of 189 lives in the U.S. alone. Fails to mention the 850 lives it saved in the U.S. alone.
From personal experience I think I can safely make assumptions about 'scientific' programs on an entertainment medium. I imagine the program deviated little from the BBC article above.
To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.
Care to explain:
* How El Niño generated $19b profit in the USA?
* How El Niño saved 850 lives in the USA?
* Something about your personal experience?
From research, documented in various science journals. The same research that also produce the figures for losses, the only figures common media reproduce.
Personal experience being "I've watched the telly before".
To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.
Impressive bibliography and experience - thanks for sharing.
Wasn't aware I was writing a dissertation. Try the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80, 9
To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.
are american "there's no such thing as climate change" sources valid in the context?
You mean American "if we'd have signed up to the Kyoto treaty it would have made a .4% difference in global climate change over 100 years". Any and every source you have to of course take it's background into consideration. Other studies cooroborate it's findings from different parts of the world.
How about, take a look at the publication I posted, read it's feature article, and check its bibliography and references.
To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
