sorry about that i meant 'Intel's new BOARDS don't support....' . And about that AMD switching to DD3 that won't happen until 2010
sorry about that i meant 'Intel's new BOARDS don't support....' . And about that AMD switching to DD3 that won't happen until 2010
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=480
Not quite ....
Using the aforementioned article actually it seems this won't be the case:
So therefore I can see how tom came to his conclusion, but not sure I'd call the gaming performance terrible, just not a big increase or anything to do a song and dance over. Could it be relating to the above another reason why the hexus article had unexpected results?Originally Posted by anandteach article
Last edited by digit; 21-08-2008 at 06:01 PM.
Well I'm not really buying an i7 purely for games - its mainly for work, which is 3D modelling and animation. With 8 threads and loads of memory bandwidth I see Bloomsfeild/Nehalem/Core i7 being a favourite for 3D amateurs and professionals.
That being said lets hope AMD's Deneb delivers a good if not comparible performance.
i hope the deneb will atleast be good or even better be able to compeat with the nehalem
Does anyone have a rough idea of the pricing of nehalem upon release?
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Hats off to Intel, they seem to have made significant progress since the Netburst saga. Maybe games like Alan Wake will expose Nehalem's true gaming potential?
Edit: scrap that idea - I had thought Alan Wake was going to implement real-time weather systems alongside other innovations that make use of multiple cores, however I've just read that its coming out on the Xbox
Last edited by =TcQi=; 30-08-2008 at 11:38 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)