Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Will the best R9 280X please step forward?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    120
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • YazX's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.5 Ghz
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Tactical Tracer DDR3 16 GB
      • Storage:
      • 128 GB Samsung SSD, 256 GB Crucial SSD, 4 TB Caviar Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 980 Ti FTW
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNova G1 1000W
      • Case:
      • CM Haf-X
      • Operating System:
      • W10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Qnix 27" 2560x1440
      • Internet:
      • 16 Mbps

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    why are you comparing non reference 280x card with Nvidia Reference Cards?!!?!? if you want to do unbiased review, then get top of the line non-reference Nvidia cards like ASUS DirectCU II or Gigabyte OC and post some numbers, GTX 770 stock clock speed 1046 Mhz and 7 Gbps memory, with Gigabyte OC it reaches 1230 MHz and 8 Gbps memory and that would beat the crap out of this card. and the price difference is like 50-70$.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked
    49 times in 38 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Quote Originally Posted by YazX View Post
    why are you comparing non reference 280x card with Nvidia Reference Cards?!!?!? if you want to do unbiased review, then get top of the line non-reference Nvidia cards like ASUS DirectCU II or Gigabyte OC and post some numbers, GTX 770 stock clock speed 1046 Mhz and 7 Gbps memory, with Gigabyte OC it reaches 1230 MHz and 8 Gbps memory and that would beat the crap out of this card. and the price difference is like 50-70$.
    Maybe you can start by explaining why reviewing a $70 more expensive card against the 280X is "unbiased"?

    Fact is, Hexus's benchmark suite is a bit friendly on Nvidia cards right now. In most places the 280X and 770 trade blows at stock, coming within a couple of percent of each other. Even on Anandtech the overclocked 280X's sail well past the 770 by 13% - http://anandtech.com/show/7406/the-s...toxic-review/3

    Putting your theory to the test however, techpowerup has reviewed the following cards -

    Asus Direct CU II 280X (slower than this Toxic) - http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...II_TOP/26.html
    Asus Direct CU II 770 OC - http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A..._II_OC/27.html
    Gigabyte 770 OC - http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/G...rce_OC/27.html

    The 780 is 13% faster than the 280X
    The 780 is 14% faster than the Asus 770
    The 780 is 10% faster than the Gigabyte 770

    So there you go, a whopping 3% faster on the Gigabyte over 18 games, and that's vs the slower Asus 280X. Quite a "crap beating" I'm sure. I hope you didn't have anything better to spend your $70 on.
    Last edited by Jimbo75; 22-10-2013 at 11:12 AM.

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Metro Manila, Paranaque City, 40 Geneva St. Bf Homes
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • pvee's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI 990 FXA-GD80
      • CPU:
      • AMD 8350FX
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (8x2) Patriot Viper 3 1600MHz Dual Channel
      • Storage:
      • 256GB OCZ Vertex 4 SSD + 2TB WD Black Caviar
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 780 3gb Reference
      • PSU:
      • Corsair GS700
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T Graphite White
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27 " Asus MX279 designo series

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    This Gpu card looks cheap with it's cooling system. one of my main issues with amd gpu cards is their cooling designs. they make it look not worth the price.

  5. #5
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    For that money, thats a huge amount of performance. Yes the cooler looks a bit tacky (I'd have prefered more muted colors) but no doubt Twin Frozr/Direct CU etc designs will address that. 780ti seems like an odd choice in the context of those results. They look like a 770ti might have been better competition. Yes 780/titan will remain the fastest single GPU card, but when you can Crossfire two of these for the same price that seems rather moot.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked
    49 times in 38 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Quote Originally Posted by herulach View Post
    Yes 780/titan will remain the fastest single GPU card.
    Oh no they won't.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    12 times in 10 posts
    • MustardCutter's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Sabretooth
      • CPU:
      • i5 3570K @ 4.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • Samsung 30nm DDR3 @ 1866
      • Storage:
      • 64Gb + 256Gb Crucial M4 SSDs, 1.5Tb Seagate HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 560 Ti @ 915MHz, 4.4GHz RAM
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Gold 850AX
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64-bit

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Quote Originally Posted by pvee View Post
    This Gpu card looks cheap with it's cooling system. one of my main issues with amd gpu cards is their cooling designs. they make it look not worth the price.
    Eh? The cooler is designed by sapphire not AMD. You get pretty similar non-reference cooling designs from the AMD and Nvidia board partners. You could almost certainly make the same complaint about non-reference Nvidia cards...

    Quote Originally Posted by herulach View Post
    Yes the cooler looks a bit tacky (I'd have prefered more muted colors) but no doubt Twin Frozr/Direct CU etc designs will address that.
    The cards you mentioned are already listed in stores and will look identical to the 7970 coolers.

    Quote Originally Posted by herulach View Post
    780ti seems like an odd choice in the context of those results. They look like a 770ti might have been better competition. Yes 780/titan will remain the fastest single GPU card, but when you can Crossfire two of these for the same price that seems rather moot.
    780ti is Nvidia's response to the unreleased 290x, not the overclocked non-reference 280x reviewed here. How can you come to such conclusions with no 290x results?
    Last edited by MustardCutter; 22-10-2013 at 01:16 PM.

  8. #8
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Quote Originally Posted by MustardCutter View Post
    780ti is Nvidia's response to the unreleased 290x, not the overclocked non-reference 280x reviewed here. How can you come to such conclusions with no 290x results?
    sorry thats me misreading the title. I have to say I did think it was a bit underwhelming!

  9. #9
    The Ace
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    373
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    I said it once and I am saying it again, Sapphire Great Job for making the cheapest 780

  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    It looks like a toy

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Will this card get bottle necked if i pair it up with an i5 3570k?

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Quote Originally Posted by NUK3 View Post
    Will this card get bottle necked if i pair it up with an i5 3570k?
    Nope.

  13. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Motherwell
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • davemaster000's system
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium G620
      • Memory:
      • Kingston HyperX 8 GB 1333
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Seagate Barracuda
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 650TI Boost
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    This card is only beatable by 780, but is much cheaper which I think is very paid GPU. Maybe I will get it over my 650Ti Boost.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    east java
    Posts
    110
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    • jackjack's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B550 Gaming Plus
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3600
      • Memory:
      • VColor 8GBx2 DDR4 3600MHz
      • Storage:
      • SK Hynix SSD 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC
      • PSU:
      • CORSAIR CX550F RGB 550 Watt
      • Case:
      • Corsair 900D
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 27G2

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    hmm with that damn good looking bad boy and performance, Sapphire R9 280X TOXIC could be the best R9 280X series ever.

  15. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    What about ASUS's DCU2 top or matrix edition of this card?

  16. #16
    The Ace
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    373
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X TOXIC

    Quote Originally Posted by hiyayhi View Post
    What about ASUS's DCU2 top or matrix edition of this card?
    That one is more like the Asus 7970 Ghz DCU2 just a little change in the clocks and not cool !

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •