I do agree, that does seem sloppy.
Although it is possible that Scan changed prices while the review was being written, even so you'd hope they'd give it a read through before publishing it.
I do agree, that does seem sloppy.
Although it is possible that Scan changed prices while the review was being written, even so you'd hope they'd give it a read through before publishing it.
Short answer, yes.
Prices changed when one page was written to another - different days. They should be consistent now, scaryjim.
What cooling was used to test the overclock?
Get the bit out of your head that you need i5 or i7 cpu performance, for 95% of us, this APU will do fine, but in graphics most of us need the best we can get, as a £125 part 7850k outperforms i5 and i7 big time, now put a 290x into the motherboard with Mantle, "bingo" top end (£1500 +) Graphics, more than enough CPU performance, nothing comes close for your money (£825) figure based on APU 7850k, memory corsair dual 2400, motherboard gigabyte x88, 290x GPU base unit, and windows 8.1 you need for all key feature to be enabled. sorted.
But if you get:
£60 X4 760K http://www.scan.co.uk/products/amd-a...he-100w-retail
that leaves you £75 for a graphics card, or for another fiver that would get you a 7770
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/1gb-a...hdmi-plusfree-
or a GTX650.
you cannot buy and i5 with comparable IGP and plug and play , for that you need to spend another £75 for an R7 240.... that money gets your some 2400 DDR3 AND 1/2 towards an FM2+ board.
so you have your i5 and gfx , I`ll have a working pc that's as good in 99% of the real world activities.
I think its very valid to remember that the vast majority of people don't need even as much CPU power as the A10-7850k offers. Most of my computing is done on a Trinity laptop, and before that I used to be quite happy with a 1.3GHz Core 2 laptop. Absolute CPU performance is kind of irrelevant at this end of the market. Of course, Kaveri is strongly targeted at laptop TDPs, and that's where I expect it to make real volume, if AMD can get the design wins in place to get it into the market.
The real comparison isn't A10 7850k v i5 anything - it's A10 7850k v i3 + £35 discrete graphics v Athlon X4 + £65 discrete graphics. If you want out and out performance, there's only one winner there really, and it's not the i3 combination That said, A10 7850k v A10 7850k with R7 250 would be an interesting comparison - is the IGP better than a £60 graphics card or not?
In theory (and its only in theory) 7850k+ R7250 should see you knocking on R7 260 performance (stuttering notwithstanding).
Crossfire with the mobile radeon parts gets more and more interesting with each APU revision, and should deliver performance/watt much better than an intel/nvidia combination.
Why is 4670K a cpu and not APU? It also has built-in gpu.
Hi every one, I find quiet interesting news at other site with Kaveri Flagship A10-7850k in Dual Graphics mode along with the Frame Pacing Fix. If this is true you can now build quiet good PC for low budget for about £350 pounds. It would be nice if Hexus people could look in to it and test it with the GDDR5 memory graphic card , if the benchmark results match, I think AMD has a good fighting chance with i3 and i5 processors in budget PC. Hexus employees could you run some benchmarks for us ? It would be very much appreciated.
Read more: http://wccftech.com/amd-kaveri-dual-...#ixzz2t2nKvbw3
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)