Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 29 of 29

Thread: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London (almost)
    Posts
    1,080
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    34 times in 28 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    I have little interest in this specific card but I like the idea of binning for a sweet spot on the power/performance curve.. which is sorta what laptop chips do but expect to see some more of this in the future.

  2. #18
    The Ace
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    373
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Finally a card from AMD that is power efficient and performs immeasurably great for its price, and this helps all those small cases and I believe there might be a steam box featuring this card in the upcoming few months...

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    33 times in 27 posts
    • Jace007's system
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 7700k
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 500GB SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia 1080
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 750w
      • Operating System:
      • WinLOW

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Silly question, Why isn't this a 8GB Card with HBM taking up less space ?

  4. #20
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    8GB isn't currently feasible for technical reasons to do with the HBM memory. It's really a non-issue though aside from losing a marketing bullet point.

  5. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    268
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    14 times in 12 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    8GB isn't currently feasible for technical reasons to do with the HBM memory. It's really a non-issue though aside from losing a marketing bullet point.
    Well they say it's not feasible but then why didn't they start with 1gb or 2gb on a card. Just smells like a marketing ploy to magically have 8gb HBM on the 'Next Gen' to me in all honesty.

  6. #22
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    I don't follow? HBM is only used on Fiji, a large high-end GPU so they're obviously going to give it a larger amount of VRAM.

    Unless they used the rumoured dual-link HBM stacking which wasn't ready, or went with a double-wide bus which would have added significantly to cost and die size (therefore probably reducing shader count as they're up against the reticle size already), >4GB of HBM1 is not feasible. That's pretty well-understood.

    If 8GB was easily achieveable for negligible cost then I imagine they would have done it, if for nothing else other than marketing and avoiding the predicable complaints when comparing it to the 390X and 980Ti memory amounts.

  7. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Pity it isn't low-profile....(I know it is short but it is too talk for many mini-itx HTPC cases!)

  8. #24
    OilSheikh
    Guest

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Quick question - what's the point of cards like this when one can buy a bigger card? Do the Nano cards take a perofrmance hit or lose the ability to OC ?

  9. #25
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Too bad about the coil whine, otherwise this would have been the ultra-compact ITX champ hands down.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  10. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Wonder if AMD will Allow PowerColor to make a Devil 13 or ASUS to bring the Ares IV with two of these in one form factor.

  11. #27
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Quote Originally Posted by Ksyruz View Post
    Wonder if AMD will Allow PowerColor to make a Devil 13 or ASUS to bring the Ares IV with two of these in one form factor.
    The concept micro-PC that was announced at the same time as the Fury series had a dual-Fiji graphics card, so there are already reference boards out there, and the only thing I can see stopping a Fury X2 would be a lack of dies/interposers preventing a worthwhile production run.

    With a single card at 175W TDP and both AMD and nvidia playing free and loose with the PCIe specs to push cards to 375W and beyond, you could easily get two of these on a single board and even have them clock slightly higher than the Nano....

  12. #28
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Tarinder - is it possible to run an extended gaming test in an SG05 over 30 minutes to see if the Nano and the mini-ITX GTX970 throttles or not??

  13. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    223
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    15 times in 10 posts

    Re: AMD Radeon R9 Nano

    Quote Originally Posted by Jace007 View Post
    Silly question, Why isn't this a 8GB Card with HBM taking up less space ?
    The same reason the Fury X isn't an 8GB card.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •