Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,587
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,019 times in 718 posts

    EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    Does Baby Turing make sense?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    £40 more than a 570 is a bit of a miss. This need to come in at £100.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,481
    Thanks
    496
    Thanked
    466 times in 324 posts

    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    I'm more concerned with it not even managing to beat a 1060, as a rule of thumb it used to be that newer cards from Nvidia would be roughly equal in performance to the next tier up from previous gen cards, you'd get 680 performance in a 770, a 960 would match those, and a 1050 would do the same.

    It seems Nvidia have broken that trend as the 1650 isn't even close to 1060 performance, me thinks they've cut to deeply.

  4. #4
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,246
    Thanks
    702
    Thanked
    1,381 times in 1,172 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 33 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    I'm more concerned with it not even managing to beat a 1060, as a rule of thumb it used to be that newer cards from Nvidia would be roughly equal in performance to the next tier up from previous gen cards, you'd get 680 performance in a 770, a 960 would match those, and a 1050 would do the same.

    It seems Nvidia have broken that trend as the 1650 isn't even close to 1060 performance, me thinks they've cut to deeply.
    Ah, but as long as they can match the 1060 on price it's good right?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •