Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    28,331
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,845 times in 628 posts

    EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    Does Baby Turing make sense?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    £40 more than a 570 is a bit of a miss. This need to come in at £100.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,799
    Thanks
    377
    Thanked
    350 times in 243 posts

    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    I'm more concerned with it not even managing to beat a 1060, as a rule of thumb it used to be that newer cards from Nvidia would be roughly equal in performance to the next tier up from previous gen cards, you'd get 680 performance in a 770, a 960 would match those, and a 1050 would do the same.

    It seems Nvidia have broken that trend as the 1650 isn't even close to 1060 performance, me thinks they've cut to deeply.

  4. #4
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    9,718
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked
    994 times in 846 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 2600X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 XC Gaming

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    I'm more concerned with it not even managing to beat a 1060, as a rule of thumb it used to be that newer cards from Nvidia would be roughly equal in performance to the next tier up from previous gen cards, you'd get 680 performance in a 770, a 960 would match those, and a 1050 would do the same.

    It seems Nvidia have broken that trend as the 1650 isn't even close to 1060 performance, me thinks they've cut to deeply.
    Ah, but as long as they can match the 1060 on price it's good right?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •