Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 18 of 18

Thread: Real world 802.11n performance

  1. #17
    Senior Member Blastuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    984
    Thanks
    93
    Thanked
    66 times in 64 posts
    • Blastuk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77X-D3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 3570
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LP 4x4GB @ 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeForce GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • OCZ ZS 650W
      • Case:
      • Antec Eleven Hundred
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2209WA 22" + Dell U2412M 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 152Mb

    Re: Real world 802.11n performance

    Quote Originally Posted by shaithis View Post
    The difference between a switch and a hub is that a hub must run all ports at the speed of the slowest negotiation.

    A switch will negotiate the fastest speed between 2 ports that are currently communicating with each other.
    Very important distinction between switches and hubs:

    A hub broadcasts packets it receives to all other ports which causes packet collision.
    A switch routes packets it receives to specific ports that it learns.

  2. #18
    Senior Member Blastuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    984
    Thanks
    93
    Thanked
    66 times in 64 posts
    • Blastuk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77X-D3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 3570
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LP 4x4GB @ 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeForce GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • OCZ ZS 650W
      • Case:
      • Antec Eleven Hundred
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2209WA 22" + Dell U2412M 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 152Mb

    Re: Real world 802.11n performance

    Quote Originally Posted by TooNice View Post
    Ah, I didn't know it would work that way. I thought that in the same way that connecting a USB 3 switch to an USB 2 device is not going to grant you USB3 speed, the speed transfer rate will be held back by the slowest device.
    If you hook a Gigabit switch to a 100 Megabit port, anything travelling through the 100 Megabit port is restricted to 100 Megabits.
    Anything travelling in through a Gigabit port on the switch and out another Gigabit port on the same switch can still be at Gigabit speed, even if that switch is connected to another 100 Megabit device.

    tl;dr, speed is limited to lowest speed link the packets travel through.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •