Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 21 of 21

Thread: Virgin Media SuperHub 3.0

  1. #17
    Chaos Monkey Apex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    4,709
    Thanks
    1,143
    Thanked
    285 times in 204 posts
    • Apex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87M-PLUS
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-4670K
      • Memory:
      • 32 GiB
      • Storage:
      • 20 TiB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • PowerColor Radeon RX 6700 Fighter 10GB OC
      • PSU:
      • 750
      • Case:
      • Core View 21
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGFA
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb nTL Cable

    Re: Virgin Media SuperHub 3.0

    Superhub 3 bugs might be related to this

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12..._firmware_fix/

    damit posted before.... anyway looks like this is still a problem for most SH3 users.

  2. #18
    Super Moderator Jonj1611's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,832
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    1,021 times in 783 posts

    Re: Virgin Media SuperHub 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    As far as I know, every single SH3 is affected due to the nature of the problem; even OEM-branded Arris Surfboard modems (from which the SH3 is derived) based on the same chipset, which are sold in e.g. USA (where you're allowed to choose and purchase your own cable modems) are affected. Whether or not you notice it may depend on what you use your connection for.

    Pingtest.net is not useful for diagnosing this problem. The following tool (or a longer test such as thinkbroadband's BQM) is much better at picking up on it: http://www.dslreports.com/tools/puma6
    Thanks, indeed there did seem to be a couple of issues highlighted but can't say I ever noticed anything. Our connection is mainly used by my son for gaming(xbox one) and my daughter who is youtube and minecraft etc. My usage is mixed, no one has reported any issues/lag or otherwise but anything that provides a better experience is always good.

    Though funnily enough I was thinking about getting a new router for wireless and using the superhub in modem mode. However if I understand it correctly the problem would still remain?
    Jon

  3. #19
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Virgin Media SuperHub 3.0

    Yes, I don't think switching to modem mode resolves the issue but there is some anecdotal evidence it can lessen the impact as there is less CPU load when it's not doing router functions.

  4. #20
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,742
    Thanks
    1,849
    Thanked
    1,442 times in 1,065 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Virgin Media SuperHub 3.0

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12..._firmware_fix/

    does anyone know if there's a firmware fix to this yet? Going into the VM settings there isn't an option to update firmware - presumably they have to push it from their side?

  5. #21
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Virgin Media SuperHub 3.0

    Yeah firmware updates are entirely controlled by VM, you can't install them manually. They occasionally ask for firmware beta testers but I'm not aware of even a beta firmware for this yet.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •