Originally Posted by
Saracen999
I did sriously think about it and was (a year or so back) close to going DM Pro, etc. What stopped me was two-fold - firstly, the data breach, and secondly, the mandatory online portal for controlling stuff. As I understand it, but having lost interest, the data breach fiasco resulted in one very positive outcome, that being that you can at least now (I think) avoid the online portal approach (if you wish) and have fully local control.
My view is that the online thing is a doubled-edged sword in that it offers advantages BUT any such incoming access also gives an extra attack surface for intruders, and one beyond my control at that. A deciding factor might be whether you need such incoming access anyway, for your other needs. I don't, so I've locked everything I can down to exclude anybody, including me, from remoting in. That does suit my needs, but it's not hard to imagine why it won't suit a lot of people.
So I ended up going the Asus router ... erm, route, instead. I stuck in a 2.5Gbit LAN but with 10Gbit backbone between switches. I thought about full 10 Gbit but it just seemed like way overkill for my needs, and the switches I have are 2.5Gbit locally, but 10Gbit between the (currently) two switches, so the backhaul doesn't bottleneck individual machines below 2.5 Gbit, even when doing big file transfers.
The Asus routers are in Mesh mode, so wifi (which now isn't used much, given the 2.5 / 10 Gbit wired links) is pretty solid. Well, rock solid. I used the very limited VLAN options to keep some stuff (like Amazon echos) off my data/NAS LAN, and it gives enough versatility for my needs. It's certainly not as configurable as "proper" managed switches and a DM Pro, external firewall etc, but I think it's good enough for my needs.
Cost? Well, it'd be a lot dearer now than when I did it, not least 'cos those 2.5G / 10G switches that were £90-ish (6 ports, one of which is 10G (copper) or 2.5G, the other 5 straight 2.5G went from that £90 to a current (eye-watering) £220-ish. The Asus routers were around £230 each (I could have done that much cheaper but went for identical routers, which is overkill but does mean I have some redundancy if one fails). Then, incidentals like cable, and a couple of 2.5G USB dongles for devices with older 1G LAN. Except the TV stuff runs via a 1 GBit switch. 'cos I figure that's all it needs.
Would I still do it this way today? I'm honestly not sure. It wasn't cheap but nor is the Ubiquiti route. I would give the Ubiquiti option another look but the issue might well be the complexity of setup versus flexibility. Ubiquiti is no doubt more flexible but at the 'cost', in my eyes anyway, of complexity. The VLANS are an example. I'm not configuring a complex office stup. It's a home, with two occupants, one of which views anything 'computer' as a necessary evil to be suffered when needed. As for me, I want to set it up as quickly as possible, with as little effort as possible, and have zero interest in 'fiddling' with it any more than necessary to coax it into doing what I want, with as much security as I can manage. Network administration for sheer interest? Not for me.
I don't know how relevant all this is, but is another perspective.
Oh, and video doorbell? That makes me a bit nervous. But CCTV camera (with sound), controlled and recording locally, covering the door? Yup, check.