Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Sorry Grodon, but your nanny-state is flawed.

  1. #1
    No more Mr Nice Guy. Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,021
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    316 times in 141 posts

    Sorry Grodon, but your nanny-state is flawed.

    Just a quick post as I'm sposed to be putting lights on the tree except I'm procrastinating as I hate doing it.

    Anyways, a thought occurred to me as I drove off to get the papers this morning and it's this:

    At the Guitar Hero 3 launch in London a short while back, the national press were invited down in the hope that they might stoop to write perhaps 30 words on GH3 and give it some publicity. Inviting Johnny Rotten along was a PR coup as the next day's papers all mentioned the GH3 gig... not because of the game but because Mr Rotten dared to light up a fag INDOORS!!!! Gasp!

    Of course, Activision were over the bloody moon as every article mentioned GH3 and nearly every paper covered the nicotine fuelled crime against humanity by Johnny and his lighter.

    But this started me thinking.

    It's such an awful thing to smoke nowadays that it's banned in every public place. Yes, it gives you cancer and you die a slow, painful and costly death, so no, you absolutely shouldn't expose those around you to your smoke.

    I have no beef with this.

    But what does irk me somewhat is the hypocrisy we see in this this public smoking ban.

    Why is the ban in place? Because for years we've know that there's a DIRECT link between smoking and all sorts of respiratory diseases.

    So if that's case, why not just ban smoking altogether? Make smoking illegal and ban the sale of cigarettes.

    Surely, if the government has our public health at heart it would do this?

    Yes, I can hear you saying that the government makes far too much money from the taxes on tobacco... but wouldn't that be off-set by the savings we'd make in the NHS that doesn't have thousand upon thousand of smoking illness related patients?

    You can argue it'd drive smoking 'underground' but so what? Ban smoking and sure as eggs is eggs, millions will give up rather than pay inflated prices AND risk a criminal record.

    So, you have to ask WHY smoking isn't banned?

    We happily block the import of Chinese made toys with too much lead in the paint and you should see the precautions taken when someone finds their garage is roofed with white asbestos yet the same guy in the bio-chem hazard suit with the military grade respirator is quite happily puffing away on 40 a day when he's not disposing of asbestos.

    Could it be that tobacco companies lobby the government like mad all the time? Perhaps the 'old-boy' network, very much a contributing factor in the Tories plunge from favour, is in full effect behind the scenes?

    Seems something of a dichotomy to me... we'll ban smoking in public 'cos we knows it's bad for everyone but we won't actually ban smoking 'cos.... well, fill in your own reason.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dareos View Post
    "OH OOOOHH oOOHHHHHHHOOHHHHHHH FILL ME WITH YOUR.... eeww not the stuff from the lab"

  2. #2
    NOT Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,905
    Thanks
    410
    Thanked
    276 times in 252 posts

    Re: Sorry Grodon, but your nanny-state is flawed.

    spelling mistake in the title nick

  3. #3
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,881
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Sorry Grodon, but your nanny-state is flawed.

    Because the govt. doesn't want to take away your right to kill yourself. Only your right to kill others.

  4. #4
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    629
    Thanked
    962 times in 813 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: Sorry Grodon, but your nanny-state is flawed.

    ^^ what he siad.

    I don't think i would have put it quite like that, but there you go.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Stupid Vs. The Nanny State
    By IBM in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-05-2007, 09:20 AM
  2. 'State sues car firms on climate'
    By J4MES in forum Automotive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-09-2006, 08:43 AM
  3. It's a nanny state!
    By iMc in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 27-02-2006, 08:07 PM
  4. Solid State Hard Disks...
    By jamin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14-08-2003, 04:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •