Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 28 of 28

Thread: is my new xp2500 ready for o/c ing????

  1. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Originally posted by silent
    yer, it's running at 2204.70 mhz at moment at 41.50 0C - under system doctor.

    will put the fsb at 220 and down the multi to 10 and see.

    what will happen if i leave the fsb at 200 and say select 12 or 13 in the multiplyer? will it just get hot?
    I would start with FSB@210 - remember that RAM you've got is only designed to run at 200.
    You could set the multiplier higher with a lower FSB but it doesn't make the most of your Ram speed. higher FSB gives you noticable performance increase by overclocking your memory as well.

    Also check your temeperatures when the CPU is busy (like when it's running prime95)

  2. #18
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    yer, 220 didn't boot at all. i selected 3200 and it is running at 2.18 mhz now, but will go tweak.

    its nice to have an old barton, as i brought it as an oem chip.

  3. #19
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    and i don;t seem to run prime95 at all. will go and see what i'm doing wrong - only just got it

  4. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    You have to run the Prime95 torture test. I think it's in the 3rd menu along.
    If you could post the codes written on the chip it could give an indication of what it's capable of.

  5. #21
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    right.

    i tried 10 x 210 and it wouldn't even boot. so i am now running it at 11.5 x 200 which is stable. 12 x 200 didn't boot either. i can run it as a stock 3200 by the looks which give 2180 mhz, or stick with 2204.70 mhz which it now is.

    prime, i didn't have them options. going to re-install it as i may have selected the wrong thing.

  6. #22
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    it's now stress testing. does it take a while?

  7. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I usually give it about ten minutes as a quick test then try a new setting.
    Which setting did you use? I reckon the middle one is better for finding FSB limits

  8. #24
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    i ran the benchmark, not that i know what it does, but i selected the 3rd one down and ran for 4 minutes. it reported no errors. i am now running the middle one and i'll leave that for 5-10 mins to.

    i am going to run the cpu at 11.5 x 200 to 'bed' it in. do you think this is the best thing as everything else failed?

  9. #25
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    oh, i don;t suppose you know what radeon 9000 pro cards o/c to do you. i have one, soon to up grade i hope, but feel like pushing it. tried before and it failed but i now have the catalyst 3.10 drivers installed.

  10. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    What else failed???
    lol i seem to have the exact same comp as you. Haven't tried overclocking my Radeon yet.

  11. #27
    True Blue! silent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Heybridge, Nr.Maldon, Essex
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    18 times in 16 posts
    Originally posted by andybasford
    What else failed???
    lol i seem to have the exact same comp as you. Haven't tried overclocking my Radeon yet.


    it just didn't get passed the first screen. pc monitor didn't boot up and computer hung.

    nice one. it runs at 2.21 ghx now, which i'm happy with and is 47oC.

    another 9000 pro user. i must say, havent had a problem with my card except on high resolutions in huge games such as moh.

  12. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I've had no trouble with it but then I don't really play fps games so Graphics isn't that important

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •