Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 23 of 23

Thread: Vista Ratings

  1. #17
    Ex-MSFT Paul Adams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    %systemroot%
    Posts
    1,926
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked
    77 times in 59 posts
    • Paul Adams's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus VIII
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2x250GB SSD / 500GB SSD / 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GeForce GTX1080
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 40" 4K
      • Internet:
      • 500Mbps fiber

    Re: Vista Ratings

    The rating system currently goes up to 5.9, as has been pointed out.

    It is not a static rating system as in a few years' time almost everything will be at maximum rating and it would have no value in discerning between systems - unless a system's given rating were to be reduced over time, which would not make much sense.
    (Kind of in the way games being rated out of 10, or as a percentage is meaningless after a few months.)

    The purpose of WinSAT is to provide a single "number" which gives an indication of your system's readiness to run different pieces of software, and manufacturers then just need to give ratings for "required" and "recommended".
    It is an "at a glance" single variable which anyone can see, and it does make sense for it to be the lowest of all the sub-ratings as that is your "weakest link"

    Most kids go for 3DMark as their e-peen

    The idea is that this single number is something any "non-geek" can shop around with, rather than having to be aware that their Ninjamatic x5000GTSLi with DDR6 RAM and their CoreBlimey8 dual hyperthreaded-quadcore CPU with 2TB of cache is sufficient to run Quake 10 - but only if they increase the free disk space from 13MB and replace that MCGA monitor.
    ~ I have CDO. It's like OCD except the letters are in alphabetical order, as they should be. ~
    PC: Win10 x64 | Asus Maximus VIII | Core i7-6700K | 16GB DDR3 | 2x250GB SSD | 500GB SSD | 2TB SATA-300 | GeForce GTX1080
    Camera: Canon 60D | Sigma 10-20/4.0-5.6 | Canon 100/2.8 | Tamron 18-270/3.5-6.3

  2. Received thanks from:

    Funkstar (12-10-2007)

  3. #18
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    630
    Thanked
    965 times in 816 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: Vista Ratings

    I guess only time will tell how well this system works.

    I guess poeple will see the 5.9 as 5.9/10, but if it is just a simple 5.9 then that makes sense.

  4. #19
    isn't trying to wind U up Shooty*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Mids
    Posts
    1,411
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked
    60 times in 48 posts
    • Shooty*'s system
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 620W
      • Case:
      • ThermalTake Tsunami Dream, black, windowed.
      • Internet:
      • Plus Net

    Re: Vista Ratings

    Right, my AMD 64 single core 4000+ gets 4.2 at 2.41 ghz

    5.9 for non-overclocked XFX 7800 GT 256 meg for Aero, 5.6 for 3d gaming

    excuse me, my son is vomitting. BRB.

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Co Durham
    Posts
    393
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts
    • hse180's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Formula V1
      • CPU:
      • i7 4770K Corsair H100i
      • Memory:
      • 16gb G-Skill Trident X
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 pro
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 290x Lightening
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX860i
      • Case:
      • Corsair Carbide 540
      • Internet:
      • Same ole , same ole rubbish

    Re: Vista Ratings

    I got 9.9 with everything..........


















    That is with a hack

  6. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hereford
    Posts
    107
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked
    20 times in 9 posts
    • Toobad's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87-Pro
      • CPU:
      • i7 4770K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8Gb Crucial Ballistix Sport
      • Storage:
      • 240GB + 120GB Sandisk Extreme SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD 7750 1Gb DDR5
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! Straight Power 480W Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal Designs Define R4
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 3007WFP-HC
      • Internet:
      • BT ADSL Max

    Re: Vista Ratings

    It is rumoured that the next release of Norton Anti-Virus will require a minimum Windows Experience Rating of 9.5. Perhaps this was a misprint and should have been 5.9 which, IMHO, sounds extremely hopeful when comparing it to their previous releases.
    Apparently, "Do whatever you like" should NOT be considered authorisation to build my uber rig!

  7. #22
    isn't trying to wind U up Shooty*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Mids
    Posts
    1,411
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked
    60 times in 48 posts
    • Shooty*'s system
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 620W
      • Case:
      • ThermalTake Tsunami Dream, black, windowed.
      • Internet:
      • Plus Net

    Re: Vista Ratings

    Heh heh heh.

    I'VE JUST DONE MY FIRST OVERCLOCK!

    Wahey!

    *ahem*
    Anyway, put a 4200+ s939 in my A8n Sli Deluxe. It got the same base score as my 4000+ single core, though I did notice a big improvement on windows start up.

    OC'd it to 2.6ghz and I've gone up to a windows rating of 5.1, from 4.1! Result!

    ...what's the burning smell?...

  8. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Slough
    Posts
    439
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    18 times in 17 posts
    • kungpo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P6T SE
      • CPU:
      • i7 920 @ 3.90 Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 6x 2GB Corsair DDR3 1600
      • Storage:
      • 2x WD AAKS 640GB RAID0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 260 GTX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 1000HX
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x LG L1952S
      • Internet:
      • 3MB ADSL

    Re: Vista Ratings

    Just dropped in a Q6600 from an E4300 and Vista score has gone for 5.7 to 5.9!

    Interestingly enough, the Q6600 is running at 2.7Ghz against the 4300 running at 3.06Ghz so the extra cores make a difference to the score.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 67
    Last Post: 23-02-2008, 03:33 PM
  2. Changes to Windows Vista Activation
    By Lee H in forum Software
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28-04-2007, 01:03 PM
  3. Abit BE7 and Vista
    By tonymarcus in forum abit.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-01-2007, 10:58 AM
  4. Windows Vista Hardware Tax
    By Matt1eD in forum Software
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 21-09-2005, 08:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •