Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Two Hardrives for Raid 0

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    warwickshire
    Posts
    47
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Two Hardrives for Raid 0

    hi all looking to do a raid setup on my Box , before i splash out is it going to be worth it for a bit of net use and playing games and DVD. If so have a 40gig already in the box and will be keeping this on the ide for backup so i will have to get 2 new drives for raid 0 whats are the options don`t need a lot of space 2 40 gigs or 2 80gig would be fine, any help please.

  2. #2
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Some nice WD 8MB cache drives might be what you're after.

    Does your motherboard support RAID?
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  3. #3
    sugar n spikes floppybootstomp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Greenwich
    Posts
    1,159
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    34 times in 30 posts
    • floppybootstomp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • i7 Sandybridge Quad Core 3.4Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Corsair 128Gb SSD; 1Tb for games; 500Gb for data
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA Nvidia 1Gb GTX 560
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 620W
      • Case:
      • Antech 900 Gamers Case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Ben Q EW2730V 27"
      • Internet:
      • Zen as ISP; Linksys Wireless Router; 4 machine network
    With IDE drives, IBM/Hitachi are reckoned to be the best for Raid 0, though whether you want to take a chance with two IBM drives is another matter.

    I'm currently using a pair of Seagate 40Gb Barracudas in a Raid 0, they work well, but ATTO benchmark scores were better on 2 x IBM 20Gb than the two 'cudas.

    Other than those two makes, I've never tried anything else for a Raid setup.

  4. #4
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by floppybootstomp
    With IDE drives, IBM/Hitachi are reckoned to be the best for Raid 0, though whether you want to take a chance with two IBM drives is another matter.

    I'm currently using a pair of Seagate 40Gb Barracudas in a Raid 0, they work well, but ATTO benchmark scores were better on 2 x IBM 20Gb than the two 'cudas.

    Other than those two makes, I've never tried anything else for a Raid setup.
    IBM Deathstars are OK if you keep them cool (I do mine.) Still, I would never trust TWO of them with my striped data!

    I have two SATA 'Cudas and they perform nice. I don't know about their IDE counterparts though. I'm still thinking the WD's with a meaty cache will be good.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  5. #5
    sugar n spikes floppybootstomp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Greenwich
    Posts
    1,159
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    34 times in 30 posts
    • floppybootstomp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • i7 Sandybridge Quad Core 3.4Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Corsair 128Gb SSD; 1Tb for games; 500Gb for data
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA Nvidia 1Gb GTX 560
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 620W
      • Case:
      • Antech 900 Gamers Case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Ben Q EW2730V 27"
      • Internet:
      • Zen as ISP; Linksys Wireless Router; 4 machine network
    Quote Originally Posted by kez
    I have two SATA 'Cudas and they perform nice. I don't know about their IDE counterparts though. I'm still thinking the WD's with a meaty cache will be good.
    I'd tend to agree with you there, I've used a few WD IDE drives recently and they've improved, imo.

    I don't have any evidence, just a gut feeling, really

    I did have one WD 120Gb 8mb cache pack up on me last week, currently rma'd with Scan, but that's the luck of the draw, I suppose, happens to most HDD manufacturers on certain batches, it seems. I wouldn't let that put me off WD though.

  6. #6
    F.A.S.T. Butuz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,708
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked
    72 times in 59 posts
    • Butuz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z77 MPOWER
      • CPU:
      • I7 3770K @ 4.6
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS 1866
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk SSDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3xR9 290
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! Dark Power Pro 10
      • Case:
      • Inwin H Frame
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
    The Benchmarks will show you a performance improvement - but in real life use you will be hard pushed to notice much of a difference, infact a 36GB Western Digital Raptor would give you just as much, if not more of an every day performance gain, without the 100% increased chance of "logical disk" faliure, plus they have 3 year waranty. Yum.

    Obviously.... theres a size penalty with the raptors, but are you really telling me you need raid-0 performance just to store your 100gb worth of "work files"?

    Butuz

  7. #7
    sugar n spikes floppybootstomp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Greenwich
    Posts
    1,159
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    34 times in 30 posts
    • floppybootstomp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • i7 Sandybridge Quad Core 3.4Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Corsair 128Gb SSD; 1Tb for games; 500Gb for data
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA Nvidia 1Gb GTX 560
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 620W
      • Case:
      • Antech 900 Gamers Case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Ben Q EW2730V 27"
      • Internet:
      • Zen as ISP; Linksys Wireless Router; 4 machine network
    Quote Originally Posted by Butuz
    Obviously.... theres a size penalty with the raptors, but are you really telling me you need raid-0 performance just to store your 100gb worth of "work files"?

    Butuz
    lol

    Apart from benchmarks, I've run single disk and Raid 0 configurations at seperate times on different machines and can honestly say there is a definite improvement in performance. In everyday use sort of terms, everything just seems 'zippier' for want of a better word Or just plain old faster.

    Biggest space hog for me is Games, all mp3's, work files, vids etc. go on a seperate storage disk.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •