Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 18 of 18

Thread: Anyone using the T-Balancer bigNG?

  1. #17
    he of many questions...
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    275
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • tensim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit iX38 QuadGT
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.2ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (4x2GB) Corsair TwinX XMS2 DHX
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD AAKS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATi HD 4870
      • PSU:
      • 650W Be Quiet Dark Power PRO
      • Case:
      • Cosmos S
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2709W
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20MB+

    Re: Anyone using the T-Balancer bigNG?

    I was mostly joking about the superglue idea Figured it'd be a permanent mount and not the best for thermal conductivity!

    Like the idea of a dab of thermal paste and a teeny bit of glue, might be a good solution.

    Another quick question; the unit comes with 2 digital sensors (in addition to 4 analogue ones), I'm assuming these willl be the most accurate and would be best mounted near the CPU and GPU?

    I guess the best spots will be directly on the heatsink base for each? Or just on the fins as close as possible to the heatpipes and base? Or somwhere else?

    cheers

  2. #18
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Anyone using the T-Balancer bigNG?

    I'm not sure what they mean by a 'digital sensor'. The actual temperature sensing element will be a thermistor, thermocouple or a special diode that changes resistance/generates a voltage/changes its characterisrics in a predicatble way in response to temperature change - and is inherently analogue. It might be that it is bonded to an A to D converter so the output is digital - so teh calibration (if any) would be unaffected by teh cable length, but it while it may be more precise, it may not be any more accurate (apart from the calibration issue - and in this application, accuracy to a degree would be good enough - and about as accurate as I would expect - even though the precision may be higher.

    As for the siting - it is part of a feedback loop. The CPU is generating heat - which is flowing through the heatsink (which has themal resistance) and is removed by the fan. The faster the fan, the greater the thermal difference, and the greater the heat flow. So if you put the sensor near the fan, it will measure the temperature there, and the CPU will be a few degrees higher, and so the sensor will be a little slower responding. Place it nearer the source and the sensor will respond quicker, but the fan may hunt more (speed up/slow down, which might be annoyinmg - it depends on the damping factor of the whole system.

    In practice it probably doesn't make much difference - anywhere convenient on a flat surface of the block - the important thing is to get good thermal contact. If you want to experiment, you could tape (use sticky tape or something) to hold the sensor in different places and see what difference it makes - personally I would n't be bothered!
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. MCubed T-balancer BigNG
    By DeSean in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 03:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •