-
3DMark '13 score thread
I'm basing this table on Fire Strike benchmark only. Download from here to participate: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/2201/mirrors.php
Scores without a valid link will not be included. I'm grabbing hardware info from the link, unless people post otherwise (I know it can be wrong with clock scaling etc).
The table got too big to fit in a single post, I've moved it to a google spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...VZJVlN2ZTVZclE
I'm no longer maintaining this spreadsheet, if anyone wants to take over I'm happy to grant full access to it.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Thread stuck. :)
Now to go get my score up.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
My first score is in:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/99627
CPU actually running at 4.2Ghz
GPU (factory overclocked) 1020/1502
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
GPU core clock not reporting correct in first test, now correct below at 1241
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/100920
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
13.1 drivers http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/102307 2645
13.2 beta 5 drivers http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/104804 2652
hmm, i score less on the graphics score for fire strike and cloudgate than Bagnaj97 does , who has the same graphics, but less ram and a slower CPU. somethings not right on mine....
it could be because ive shuftied my card to the lower slot which is only an x8 speed insted of a x16 speed. (i needed the use of all 6 sata ports)
or its the extra 50mhz core theyre running on the GPU
i need to check, not that im bothered in the slightest, it could be anything, even the very messy 3 year old windows installation.
edit, re-ran with newer drivers albeit beta ones. score went up a bit and down a bit in areas.
im putting it down to a x8 slot and messy windows with stuff running in background. ivedecided. so thats that.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
i7 960 / 1GB GTX 560 Ti (384 shaders, 'OC' edition - stock clocks 900 GPU / 2000 mem)
(yes, I have a silly amount of RAM installed - it will be moved to a VMWare machine at some point)
CPU speed is all over the place in the results but after monitoring it during the runs it pretty much stays locked at 3.33GHz. Haven't tried overclocking the CPU as either the CPU or more likely the mobo I have is a completely pants - can barely squeeze an extra MHz out and get the damn thing to boot.
Max GPU clock seems to be 1050MHz or thereabouts (at 1.2V) - anything more than that and I get a hard lock in the middle of the test run.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Here are my scores for a 2500k @ 4.2 and a 7850 @ 975 / 1250. Did a lot better than I thought too, especially for ice storm.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/104227
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Hmm, no APUs. Anyone got an a10-5800k laying around?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Just tried the 13.2 Beta 5 Catalyst drivers and got a new result, slightly better than before now, with both GPUs working.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Just for curiosity, I ran my 2500k @ 4.6 and my 7850 @ 1025/1250.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/106299
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
I've overclocked my CPU in this one, running at 4.5ghz:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/106642?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/62274
phenom 1090T X6 @ 3.6ghz , 7870
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
Hmm, no APUs. Anyone got an a10-5800k laying around?
Will be running it on my A6-3670k in the near future :) And given I have a kick-ass cooler, I'll probably be able to try it with a moderate overclock too (hopefully I'll be able to bump the memory up slightly too - my 1600MHz RAM runs at 1.35v, so can take some extra voltage ;) ).
Will also be running the DX9/DX10 tests on my HD4200/HD3470/hybrid crossfire setup - once I get a DP - VGA adapter. Dunno if it's worth putting an extra table in this thread or whether we should have separate threads for each test?
EDIT: is it worth putting a link to the test download page in the OP of this thread? That way we've got a single place for the download and to post results! About to test my laptop, which I think is only DX10 - more for reference when we get the Android version ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/108202? much better than before. New drivers and a couple of tweaks.
GPU showing wrong it's 1250
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chuckskull
Much better
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/109030
CPU is @ 4.5GHz, must've powered down by the time it took a reading.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Here are my initial results with an overheating CPU and no GPU drivers apart from the default installed; everything is at stock:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/81246
Will update it once I sort out the cooler and download the latest driver, too busy lately!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Hi,
been lurking here for a while so thought I would post my results, forgive me it wont let me put the full link as im too new!
3dmark.com/3dm/119510
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/33802
670 Result, CPU is stock, GPU clocked at 967mhz core and 6208mhz mem.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Well, here's my first run, on my Acer 3810TZ laptop ;) http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/126900
Obviously there's no Fire Strike, and tbh I was a little worried that she might curl up and die during cloud gate (I don't think it acheived as high as 1fps at any point!), but it handled Ice Storm pretty well. I'll be testing HD4200 before too long, which was released around the same time as Intel's X4500, so that'll be an interesting comparison :) Then when the Android version is out I can do my phone ...
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
^ well at least im not at the bottom anymore :p
that is until i test my onboard ATI3300 :D it can play crysis, so i hold high hopes on beating your measly 106 for cloud strike scaryjimbo
/sarcasm off.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
HD3300 :o That might beat my HD4200 with sideport (until I overclock it of course ;) ) :D
Bagnaj: are you willing to maintain scores for the other tests? Or would you prefer someone else to stack them in a new thread?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scaryjim
Bagnaj: are you willing to maintain scores for the other tests? Or would you prefer someone else to stack them in a new thread?
I will give him a prod.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Realised my first run was done with laptop on "balanced" power profile rather than "performance". Graphics was about the same, got a small boost in physics scores (due to the CPU running at 1.3GHz instead of 1.2GHz ;) ). Difference was pretty insignificant though.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scaryjim
Bagnaj: are you willing to maintain scores for the other tests? Or would you prefer someone else to stack them in a new thread?
I'll happily maintain tables for Ice Storm and Cloud Gate for devices that need them, but I'm only going to put machines into their highest capable table. Putting all the Fire Strike machines into the Cloud Gate and Ice Storm tables as well would be too much work!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
I'll happily maintain tables for Ice Storm and Cloud Gate for devices that need them, but I'm only going to put machines into their highest capable table. Putting all the Fire Strike machines into the Cloud Gate and Ice Storm tables as well would be too much work!
Yeah, I never anticipated you putting all the scores on every table :) Thanks mate.
Just as a thought, it might be worth putting the lowest scoring set up from each test in the table for the previous test: so e.g. Phage's Cloud Gate test result would go in the Cloud Gate chart as a performance reference for the DX10 cards to the DX 11 ones? Or would that cause too much confusion?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/136120
tweaked abit more - new score for fire strike :D
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scaryjim
Just as a thought, it might be worth putting the lowest scoring set up from each test in the table for the previous test: so e.g. Phage's Cloud Gate test result would go in the Cloud Gate chart as a performance reference for the DX10 cards to the DX 11 ones? Or would that cause too much confusion?
If we get some more DX10 results I may do that, but anything DX11 capable is going to destroy your GMA X4500! I'll attempt to get a 9800gt score over the weekend (unless anyone has a later DX10 GPU), and then I'll add the closest Cloud Gate DX11 GPU score (rather than the lowest). That way you can compare DX10 GPUs to each other, and see which GPUs will be equal or better once you make the jump to DX11.
In addition to my earlier APU request, I'd also like to see how the Intel IGPs stack up. Loads of Intel CPUs on the list already, someone must be willing to test out the IGP!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
I've got the tests loaded on my work laptop (i7-2640M) so we'll have a high end Intel IGP in there soon :)
I'll also be doing more DX10 results at home, with HD4200 IGP, a HD3470 discrete card, then the pair in Hybrid crossfire. I'll probably test several different clock speeds as well (since my HD4200 should do the ~ 800MHz the 3470 runs at ;) ).
I'll try to grab some time to run the A6-3670k over the weekend, and once I get my son's desktop back from the friends who borrowed it (I've just dropped their new gaming rig off so that could easily be this weekend :D) I'll have a high end DX9 (7900GTO) result to go in the Ice Storm table (although I suspect we'll have to wait for the Android/iOS version to come out before we get many Ice Storm results).
My request, if anyone still has an old rig around, is a test of Q6600 + 8800GTX. That'll let me compare my old rig to my new one...
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
My PC with everything at stock (i5 3570K & HIS Radeon 7950 Boost):
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/91023
And our living room PC with everything at stock (i5 2500 & KFA2 GTX 660 Ti):
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/96745
.... Why do these results show incorrect CPU speeds?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
1600MHz is the default idle speed for modern Intel CPUs. It's probably picking up the system info with the CPU at idle. I guess with turbo technolgies it's hard for programs to guarantee that they're pushing a CPU to its default clock rather than a turbo state? Either that or you've got Windows power scheme set to one that keeps your CPU in idle state all the time...?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
5861: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/97130
Everything at stock.
Edit: Having to run all the tests is painful.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
Edit: Having to run all the tests is painful.
Not quite as painful as paying £15 for it - when's the next steam sale?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Website's down :rolleyes:
Think I'll put off running on my work laptop for a few minutes....
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PowerPie5000
.... Why do these results show incorrect CPU speeds?
This is probably due to the program ending and then gathering your pc specs when its back at its idle or less clocked speed.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
6843: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/97452
CPU @ 5GHz, GPU +130/500.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Interestingly, to me at least, my FX6300 @ 4.3GHz is thoroughly beaten by HalloweenJack's Phenom II X6 at 3.6 GHz in the physics test. I guess the physics test is heavily FPU intensive and so Vishera is hit hard by having half the number of FPUs, despite the clockspeed advantage.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
OK, work laptop done, i7-2640M/HD3000 (DX10 only): http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/137519
Bit of an improvement from X4500, eh ;) Less than 1000 points behind the GTX 525m, not a bad showing from Intel (although compare the graphics scores and it's not so good - the better physics score from the i7 pulls the overall score up a bit).
Can't wait to do the HD4200 + Phenom II X4 and A6-3670k now ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
6974: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/97619
GPU +150/600.
Edit: Time to gun for first place ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
... Im contemplating a second 660ti
:innocent:
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
... Im contemplating a second 660ti
:innocent:
For your X4 to starve it? :P
I'm guessing the benchmark is better where AMD is concerned given the score difference between myself and Phage.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
Edit: Time to gun for first place ;)
Looking at Chuckskull and RhinoUK you've got a fair bit of headroom on your GPU core!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Damn - I thought it was my good looks and charm ! :naughty:
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
For your X4 to starve it? :P
I'm guessing the benchmark is better where AMD is concerned given the score difference between myself and Phage.
I have a 3570K and GA-Z77X-UD5H waiting to be put together (I/O Plate is on the way) ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
Looking at Chuckskull and RhinoUK you've got a fair bit of headroom on your GPU core!
Nar, mine craps out @ around +170 (so 1228 from stock of 1058) on the core depending on the benchmark.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
I have a 3570K and GA-Z77X-UD5H waiting to be put together (I/O Plate is on the way) ;)
I can always blame the lack of PCI-e 3.0 on my CPU. :mrgreen:
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Cracking OC at 5Ghz ! You should beat me on the physics tests by a long shot. I might have to revisit the GPU ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
We need to make the most of it before piggin comes in and takes over.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
I have a 3570K and GA-Z77X-UD5H waiting to be put together (I/O Plate is on the way) ;)
Did you have an HD5870 before?? Any chance you can run that??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
Interestingly, to me at least, my FX6300 @ 4.3GHz is thoroughly beaten by HalloweenJack's Phenom II X6 at 3.6 GHz in the physics test. I guess the physics test is heavily FPU intensive and so Vishera is hit hard by having half the number of FPUs, despite the clockspeed advantage.
Your overclocked FX6300 beats my Xeon E3-1220 which is a Core i5 2400 with more L3 cache,and a Core i5 2500K running at stock clockspeeds.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAT-THE-FIFTH
Did you have an HD5870 before?? Any chance you can run that??
Yeah mate, I've not forgotten! Got a weekend to myself so im gunna geek out!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
Yeah mate, I've not forgotten! Got a weekend to myself so im gunna geek out!
I know I am asking a lot,but is possible to run it at stock on your stock Core i5?? My Xeon E3-1220 is a bit slower than your Core i5 3570K at stock clockspeeds,but I would like to see how an overclocked HD5850 1GB does against a stock HD5870 1GB!!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAT-THE-FIFTH
I know I am asking a lot,but is possible to run it at stock on your stock Core i5?? My Xeon E3-1220 is a bit slower than your Core i5 3570K at stock clockspeeds,but I would like to see how an overclocked HD5850 1GB does against a stock HD5870 1GB!!
Is the test not multi threaded?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
behold, my mighty onboard ATI 3300 HD http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/139461
fyi, anyone else deciding to run an older ATI card the 4xxx series and earlier.
make sure youve got a copy of the legacy drivers from here. from 12.8 version onwards they've split them up into seperate files.
edit, see scaryjims post further down. i need to read stuff better :)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
The results on the 680's are all similar even though we have different GPU/MEM clocks. Im still tweaking to push a bit more out but dont seem to be stable past 1280 on the GPU. I think Terbinator may have a golden GPU and there is more to come from his card :)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stevie lee
880 points ahead of me :o
2000 points behind Intel HD3000 :o
Physics scores look funky though - my i7 narrowly beats your 920 on the cloud gate physics, but loses badly to it on the ice storm physics...? :O_o1:
EDIT: also, look out for my mega overclocking efforts to try to surpass you on my 785G board with a Phenom II X4 - let the contest ... begin!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
Is the test not multi threaded?
I think it is,but it is still more GPU intensive. I suppose if you set your Core i5 3570K to 3.1GHZ to 3.4GHZ,it would be closer,but I want to get a rough ballpark figure. I am running the 13.2 BETA2 drivers IIRC. I might update them to the latest ones to see if anything improves,although I doubt it!!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stevie lee
fyi, anyone else deciding to run an older ATI card:
you HAVE TO put on 12.6 drivers or earlier. 12.8 or newer does NOT contain any drivers for 4xxx series or earlier, it just shows up as an unknown device.
I'm going to try over the weekend, and will download and install this set of drivers, which is the 13.1 legacy pack. I'll let you know how I get on :)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
I would run this on my A6-3670K,but I am a tad scared the stock cooler might melt.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
You'd be amazed how capable the stock cooler is CAT - have you not read my review!? ;) It will sound like a 787 taking off though, and with a similar level of fire risk!
I, however, have no such worries, because my 3670K now has one of these securely installed:
http://forums.hexus.net/members/scar...big-cooler.jpg
:rockon: :mrgreen:
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scaryjim
I'm going to try over the weekend, and will download and install
this set of drivers, which is the 13.1 legacy pack. I'll let you know how I get on :)
k.. theyre still doing drivers but in a seperate file. thats not how i read it when they switched to that method. i thought theyd stopped at 12.6 for good, no more improvements.
i really should read stuff more closely. ill edit my post above to avoid mass confusion about the matter. :)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
5627 for my system as it currently stands; http://www.3dmark.com/fs/99521
i7 920 @ 3.778GHz, 2GB Gigabyte GTX 670 WindForce 3X @ stock (980MHz core, 1502Mhz mem).
I may have a fiddle later tonight and see if I can break the 6000 barrier.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAT-THE-FIFTH
I think it is,but it is still more GPU intensive. I suppose if you set your Core i5 3570K to 3.1GHZ to 3.4GHZ,it would be closer,but I want to get a rough ballpark figure. I am running the 13.2 BETA2 drivers IIRC. I might update them to the latest ones to see if anything improves,although I doubt it!!
I think you will have to live with the stock results :p
Im probs not going to do anything with the i5 stuff this weekend anyway as my i/o plate hasnt arrived, but i can test out the 5870 on my AMD chip for now.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
too much hassle to swap back to the onboard 3300 and try with the proper drivers ;)
im back to the 7770. your just competing againts yourself new jimbob :p
my experiment -
CPU overclocked from 2.8 to 3.1GHz
graphics core from 1100 to 1150 MHz
graphics memory from 1300 to 1350 MHz
not a lot, but as card is pre overclockd, didnt want to stress it too much.
old results - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/104804
overclocked results - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/141098
ice storm goes up 9562 points
cloud gate goes up 546
fire strike goes up 50
so still behind Bagnaj in fire strike, whos got a lower clocked card and a lower CPU. absolutely destroy them in every other test.
im assuming Bagnaj has their card in a x16 speed slot. mines just in a x8.
so for DX11 stuff at least my card is being severly bottlenecked, and DX10 just a little bit.
which just goes to show that you need to plug stuff in the right holes or else youll end up hurting yourself. :mrgreen:
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Right, benched a 9800gt/e6300 for Cloud Gate testing. http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/141295 with the cpu at 2.33, http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/143064 with the cpu at 2.8.
The overall score is fairly similar to ScaryJim's because the CPU is dragging it down. If you compare the graphics score the 9800gt destroys Intel's HD3000m. No surprises there! Now I want to see an a10-5800k to compare cloud gate with. Mainly because I'm considering replacing this PC with one!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Managed to squeeze a bit more but i think ive reached the limit 7063
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/143278
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Cloud Gate appears to be more CPU heavy than GPU heavy. A 9800GT obliterates a HD3000 for gaming in reality.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
just won a 3dmark serial in an FB competition so heres my fire strike `extreme` score:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/145756
*gulp*
storming physics though ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
would like to see an octo BD or PD score
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Update - new score 7336
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/155817
3570k @4.4
7970 @ 1450/1500
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Erm - do I win a prize for the most mental overclock? Seems stable. I should point out this is on an iMac with NO CPU overclocking. GPU has had the norks overclocked off it though!
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/156503
Overclock actually seems limited by MSI Afterburner - ie the slider won't move any further!
5872
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/156805
new score
1090T @3.6ghz , 7870 @ 1175/1250
5305
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Domestic_Ginger 3550 2600k@4.0 5850@900/1100 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/153639?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Domestic_Ginger
Your link does not work.
Here is the link for the OP:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/153639
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Upped core to 975MHZ:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/158736
Not sure if it is game stable as at 925MHZ it is.
It does appear 3DMark is quite CPU bottlenecked too.
It is interesting to see that an HD5850 1GB running at 975MHZ is very close to a GTX560TI running at the same core speed,despite the lower tessellation ability of the HD5800 series.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Noooo, Phage has been knocked off top! I wonder what Macadee's GPUs coupled with Terb's 5GHz 2500k would score...
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Have just re-found the GPU tweaker to get past 1050 catalyst limit, will play more tomorrow.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
Noooo, Phage has been knocked off top! I wonder what Macadee's GPUs coupled with Terb's 5GHz 2500k would score...
You've entered cards as 7870, they are only 7850 :)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/176095
My score, as per the spec in My system.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
5224 for single 7850 @ 1250/1450 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/172598
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
Noooo, Phage has been knocked off top! I wonder what Macadee's GPUs coupled with Terb's 5GHz 2500k would score...
I'm going to donwload the standalone exe i think i try that. Surely there's more points not having to run it via Steam. Think of all the extra cycles, man.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
An AMD hex core on top? But you can only seriously game on an intel core ix... right?! ;)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
I'm going to donwload the standalone exe i think i try that. Surely there's more points not having to run it via Steam. Think of all the extra cycles, man.
Overclock my 3770K to 4.5ghz only added nearly 100 points to my score, I very much doubt that running the test without Steam loaded would make it significantly higher, I'd expect the results to be within the same sort of margin of variation that you get when running the same test two or three times in a row without making any changes.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
I think the HD7970 Phage has was running at 1150MHZ NOT 1450MHZ. If it were the latter it would be a world record for an air cooler HD7970 I suspect!!:P
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAT-THE-FIFTH
I think the HD7970 Phage has was running at 1150MHZ NOT 1450MHZ. If it were the latter it would be a world record for an air cooler HD7970 I suspect!!:P
Aye Core at 1150 and memory at 1450 (or was it 1500..Can't remember !)
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
An AMD hex core on top? But you can only seriously game on an intel core ix... right?! ;)
The 1100T were beast chips for '11 at least. They can drag so much more points form the physics tests, especially when oc'd reasonably hard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KeyboardDemon
Snip...
But that's what makes it fun, isn't it?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Macadee
Have just re-found the GPU tweaker to get past 1050 catalyst limit, will play more tomorrow.
What are your voltage settings for 1250/1450?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Here ya go CAT, i ran the test with my 5870 and got 3323. Looks like, at least with the phenom, your overclocking does the job!
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/181862
Again thats with my CPU at 4.2, GPU has stock clocks
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Krpetrov
What are your voltage settings for 1250/1450?
Max avail on GPU tweak, 1.225v
I also did a couple of runs at 1290/1450 but the scores were slightly lower?
About to try x-fire shortly
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
Here ya go CAT, i ran the test with my 5870 and got 3323. Looks like, at least with the phenom, your overclocking does the job!
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/181862
Again thats with my CPU at 4.2, GPU has stock clocks
It does look like an overclocked HD5850 1GB does match or exceed an HD5870 1GB running at stock clockspeeds!
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
7952 with 7850 CF 1250/1450 & 1050/1450 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/183652, 2nd card is newer and locked to 1050 max core
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Just gave it my all, 4.8ghz 2500k, with a oc 1050/ 1250 on a HD 7850, and gained just 85 points lol, 4695. Upping my memory any more just got me a blank screen.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/184421
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Sorry guys, busy weekend was busy so no time for messing with computers :( Also still waiting to find a magic free DP - VGA adapter for my 3470 ;)
It looks like the final score is quite heavily weighted towards the physics scores, which means better CPUs can easily compensate for poor graphics. Wonder how the picture would change if you just charted the graphics score and ignored the physics...
EDIT: checking the chart, the 9800GT Eco has more than double my HD3000 in graphics, but less than 30% higher overall score. Bad weighting for what is primarily a graphics benchmark, IMNSHO.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
i do wonder if a dedicated physx card would help?
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HalloweenJack
i do wonder if a dedicated physx card would help?
No. There is nothing using Physx.
-
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scaryjim
EDIT: checking the chart, the 9800GT Eco has more than double my HD3000 in graphics, but less than 30% higher overall score. Bad weighting for what is primarily a graphics benchmark, IMNSHO.
The combined scores are all higher from 2-4th place than 1st too.
Edit: I wonder why there is such a gulf in my score versus other 680s?